I believe it might qualify as a Starker exchange.
Taxpayer buys artwork. Within 45 days identifies another piece of art and sells it within 180 days. (The original dealer has received his money and gone away.)
Any help would be appreciated.
Gary
I believe it might qualify as a Starker exchange.
Taxpayer buys artwork. Within 45 days identifies another piece of art and sells it within 180 days. (The original dealer has received his money and gone away.)
Any help would be appreciated.
Gary
Help is at
Is taxpayer in the trade or business of buying and selling artwork at a profit?
If not, forget deferred exchanges.
If this artwork is "inventory" - held for sale or exchange in a trade or business by the taxpayer - the "exchange" can't be a section 1031 like-kind exchange no matter how you do it.
*Inventory* is not eligible for like-kind exchange treatment.
Thanks Alan. As it turns out, the taxpayer already took possession so it's disqualified.
Gary
Art, investment property includes artwork so a painting would qualify.
Investment property only includes art that is held for investment. Not all art is held for investment. There are cases on this subject that set out the criteria for when art is considered to be held for investment. E.g., see Wrightsman v. U.S., 192 Ct. Cl. 722 (1970)
BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.