Fiduciary duty and "selling away"

Nov 10, 2006 1 Replies

If you're an Investment Advisor Representative (IAR) working for a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA or "Broker Dealer"), and you're offering fee-based financial planning services, isn't there a conflict between your fiduciary duty to your client and the NASD rules which prohibit selling away?



As an example, if I uncover that the client would be better off moving their account to another B/D, aren't I violating the rules against selling away if I tell them that?



I believe that you are mis-understanding the NASD rule of selling away. For me to sell away would be to sell an investment to a client and collect a commission on the sale of that investment. By the way, a "Broker Dealer" and a "Registered Investment Advisor" are 2 separate and distinct registrations. Many Broker Dealers are also Registered Investment Advisors. Broker Dealers (and their Registered Representatives) are held to a "Suitability" standard. Registered Investment Advisors (and their Investment Advisor Representatives, IARs) are held to a higher fiduciary or "client's best interest" standard.

The financial services industry is currently suffering from from a lot of internal rifts. The "Merrill Lynch Rule" specifically omits BDs who are also RIAs from a fiduciary standard. See

formatting link
for more info...

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required