The Wall Street Journal will publish an article in their weekend edition which states pretty much the opposite of the Barron's article we discussed here a few weeks back (isn't Barron's owned by Dow Jones who also owns WSJ?)
The story, previewed on CNBC, interviewed retirees after the fact (i.e. already retired) whose spending averaged, post retirement;
significantly lower 8% somewhat lower 25% same 28% somewhat higher 27% significantly higher 12%
Looks like a bell centered on 'same', which the interview didn't quantify, but logic would say that's 75-80% post tax, SS, and saving for retirement. As with any set of data, it's easy to draw whatever conclusion you wish. The 'significantly higher' may be the 12% of the people who worked so many hours and made so much money they simply didn't enjoy them selves and now they realize they may as well spend it. It doesn't necessarily reflect that a random 1000 people now would need to plan this way.
JOE