taxable vs. tax-exempt in a roth ira

just double checking but isn't it correct that if one has funds in a vanguard taxable money-market (ie. VMMXX) fund in a roth ira, since there are no taxes if held 5 years and after 59.5 years, it makes no difference versus a tax-exempt money-market (ie. VMSXX) ?

since this is in a roth ira, there's no issue about the tax either way, so it's only a matter of better return in one money-market account versus the other?

or is there something else to be aware of?

Reply to
Pete
Loading thread data ...

Pete wrote on [Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:13:59 -0500]:

Not really.

Reply to
Justin

Don't hold any tax advantaged investment in a tax advantaged account. This is true of either Roth IRA or regular IRA. In a Roth you will not be taxed with you withdraw your funds for retirement. In a regular IRA funds from a taxable MMF or a tax exempt MMF will both be taxed the same way.

Reply to
PeterL

Pete- As someone else already posted, you should never hold a tax-exempt investment (such as a municipal bond, or a tax-exempt municipal money-market fund) within a Roth IRA.

"Tax exempt" means that the interest you receive each year isn't taxable on your federal or state tax return. But all interest earned from the investments in a Roth IRA is free from tax, regardless of what type of investment it comes from. And whether a Roth IRA withdrawal is taxed or not has nothing to do with the source of the income within the IRA -- it's based only on the rules for Roth distributions.

So there's no benefit to earning tax-exempt interest within a Roth, and in fact there' a penalty...tax-exempt rates are always lower than taxable rates, so you should to for the higher-interest (taxable) alternatives.

-Tad

Reply to
Tad Borek

If it had a higher return than a taxabIe investment I would. However nearly all of the tax advantaged investments I am aware pay out less as a taxable investment for the same asset class.

Reply to
rick++

Be very careful about only focusing on returns. If a tax advantaged investment has a higher return than a taxable investment in the same asset class it has a much higher risk. High risk investments don't belong in an IRA.

Reply to
catalpa

Why not? While it makes sense that you may not want to put a tax-advantaged investment into a tax-advantaged account, I'm sure there are many non-tax-advantaged mutual funds, not to mention individual securities, with the same risk as your hypothetical high-return, tax-advantaged investment. I would guess that these are still appropriate for IRAs.

-Will

Reply to
Will Trice

I don't follow, please explain. Are you suggesting that mid and small- cap value investments should not go into a tax advantaged account also?

I can see how one might want to put high risk investments in a taxable account so that the losses can be realized, but then so are the gains. I'm being a bit dense today, please clarify.

Thanks

Reply to
kastnna

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.