"W. Wells" wrote
I see media reports from early 2007 noting the lack of transparency in banks reporting exposure to subprime mortgages. No one (except maybe insiders of each bank) could say which bank had the most exposure. Choosing banks in which to invest then becomes capricious. Buffett IIRC spoke about the real estate bubble and tranching mortgages, that these were insanity. Is the current pricing of BAC based merely in hysteria? Or is it based in little factoids like it has had huge writedowns and has a dividend payout ratio that shot up to over 100% recently? I do not think so. It is hard for me to believe that Buffett would not proceed with more caution when purchasing banks last summer, unless he made a mistake. I would have thought someone like him would hope for a dive in the BAC price rather than buying near a high in a precarious time for mortgages and housing and so banks.
Still, for the long term, we laypeople might extrapolate what happened c. 1991 and the following five years. Many banks recovered and restored their dividends.
To be revisited in five years or so. Or it would sure make sense if Buffett bought more BAC right now, wouldn't it? If he does not, well I think he knows he got burnt at least a little.
-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.