1099-G from Joint Return Received after Divorce

I filed my state (LA) tax return for TY 2006 in December 2007. In 2006 I was married and filed a joint return. I divorced in March 2007. The state paid the refund in 2008, and that went into a joint account (see my other post). Now, I received a 1099-G for TY 2008 that was paid in response to the 2006 return. About half of the amount on the 1099-G represents withholdings from my ex-wife's job; the rest is a refundable credit attributable to my occupation. The amount is significant. The amount is also easy to figure out since our joint taxable income that year was zero. I feel that each of us should report our respective amounts on our individual returns. Who reports what? And how do I document this on my tax return so I don't flag an audit? The 1099-G has both our names and SSNs on it. The LA Dept. of Revenue says they mailed each of us the same 1099-G.

Reply to
Rick Hess
Loading thread data ...

The rule is that you have taxable income from this refund only to the extent that you had a tax benefit from it.

If you are convinced you received only half the benefit and she received the other half, you can claim half and convince her to claim the other half. If you cannot convince her to claim the other half, you will have a fight on your hands. The IRS wants its share of that income and if you can't agree, there's no reason why the IRS would not to try to get it all from you.

Reply to
Arthur Kamlet

Except, Art, I think Loosana is one of those communistic states. Might that make a difference?

ChEAr$, Harlan

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

On your return you should pick up the entire refund as income on Form 1040, Line 10.

Then on Line 21 back out the portion that belongs to your ex and include a brief description, her name and SSN should be sufficient.

This way you've picked up ALL that was reported to you so you avoid the "not reporting" issue AND you back off the part that belongs to her and identify her so they can trace it to her return - the rest is on her.

Good luck, Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA

P.S. - While I believe this info is good, it is worth every penny you paid for it!

Reply to
Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, AB

Since the 1099-G has both our names and SSNs on it, why would the IRS try to get it from only me instead of from both of us?

Here's a little more info that may or may not make any difference in your answer: We had a prenup that declaired us separate in property. I'm a Real Estate Professional who had enough investment property losses and depreciation (properties in my name only) that our taxable income was zero. Had it not been for those losses, my ex definately wouldn't have received 100% of her W-2 withholdings.

Reply to
Rick Hess

Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA wrote: [...]

My only quibble is that the allocation should be shown on Line 10. For example, in a community property state such as California, if spouses file separately, they are expected to maintain the nature of each type of community income by documenting the split on *each* line of the 1040 (wages, interest, etc) -- you should *not* combine all the adjustments on line 21.

It is not unusual for the taxable state tax refund reported on Line 10 to not match the amount on the 1099-G, often with only a worksheet in the taxpayer's records to back it up. So that issue alone should not be a reason to "flag an audit".

-Mark Bole

Reply to
Mark Bole

...And what did your divorce decree say about this?

(If it was silent, then you should sue your lawyers for malpractice!)

Reply to
D. Stussy

There is no specific mention of it. No one thought of it since it was such an unusual circumstance. I didn't receive the 1099-G until 1/15/09.

I called my attorney after checking the decree; he suggests that I report

100% and try to get my ex to reimburse 50% of the additional tax liability.
Reply to
Rick Hess

Time for me to add to the thread. If I were preparing your return, I would simply place half of the amount on the 1040 page one line for state tax refund. In my experience, IRS never has and IMO never will take you to task for the other 50%. and that's a fact.

ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

Future tax issues and other contingencies should ALWAYS be included in a divorce agreement or decree.

I agree with Harlan - meaning that your attorney is a tax idiot.

Reply to
D. Stussy

When I read and then re read your line above, it seems that the attorney is a tax idiot beCAUSE you agree with me.

I'm thrilled, D! (grin

I think.

hmmm.. maybe.

Oh whattheheck? it's happy hour. It's been a rather taxing day.

Finding out that although client is entitled to the added 600$ Recovery rebate credit, IRS has decreed now NOT to put it on the 1040. GAAaAAAAHHH!

ChEAr$, Harlan

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

GAAaAAAAHHH!

Then what is line 71 for?

Reply to
D. Stussy

"Rick Hess" wrote

Many thanks to those who responded.

Reply to
Rick Hess

Of course that is what it is for. IRS in it's finite wisdom designed the form 1040 correctly. But..... now they're saying don't fill it in if a positive figure. They will do the math and issue a separate refund.

makes you wonder.

ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

After your first post, I went to their web site and looked under the "news" category - and found no such information.

formatting link
6065,00.htmlPage titled: Recovery Rebate Credit Information CenterPage Last Reviewed or Updated: January 16, 2009 If this is true, not even the IRS has it on their site yet.

Reply to
D. Stussy

All of which has changed as of yesterday afternoon. See my and Alan's separate posts.

Tomorrow? Well I just don't know. Like Scarlett O'hara,

"I'll worry about that tomorrow."

ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.