Claiming dependent...Fed/State the same rules?

I am trying to do my boyfriends taxes and have a question. He has a friend who has been staying at his place for 1 1/2 years. My boyfriend lets him sleep on the couch and his friend also has meals with him. He has no income and no one is claiming him as a dependent. My question is this. From what I've read my boyfriend can claim this person as a dependent on his federal income tax (1040A). On his California income tax, I'm not sure. I can't seem to find anything that says you can claim a friend, girlfriend, etc. (non-relative) in the California income tax code. If you can claim a person on your Federal income tax as a dependent, can you claim him on the California income tax? Are the rules the same? Please help..this is driving me nuts. Thank you funbun

> > > > > > > > >
Reply to
funbun16
Loading thread data ...

Your boyfriend CANNOT claim his "friend" as a dependent on his Federal income tax based on what you've written. See the Instructions for the 1040 under dependents. Your boyfriend would be well advised to consult with the IRS or a tax professional regarding this issue. Check out

formatting link
for an answer to your Californiaquestion. I would seriously doubt that California wouldallow that either, though.

Reply to
Bob

California's definition of a dependent is the same as federal. CRTC Sec 17056 conforms to IRC Sec. 152 as it was in effect as of January 1 2005 (for purposes of taxable years beginning in 2005 and 2006 - CRTC Sec. 17024.5).. The major federal changes in Sec. 152 were enacted in 2004 and therefore were in effect as of that date. Katie in San Diego

Reply to
Katie

Often state rules are different, although I can't speak for California. Example being in "this" LA, a person may deduct as an exemption an unrelated party (like a cousin), however Alabama state law prohibits such. Check the California web site , unless Nan weighs in first!

ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

Under the circumstances, it may just be a short putt. :)

Reply to
Dick Adams

Why not? Assuming the friend is a US citizen the friend meets all the requirements for being a qualifying relative for dependency purposes. The friend does not qualify the taxpayer for Head of Household filing status because there's no relationship by blood or marriage.

-- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD

Reply to
Phil Marti

Why not? It seem to me that he meets the "Qualifying Relative" test.

  1. Not a qualifying child test - obviously
  2. Member of household or relationship test - He has lived there for 1 1/2 years. Only 1 year is required to meet this test although we don't know how continuous the living arrangements have been during the year but we can't tell that from what was posted. (note that a member of the household does not have to be a "blood" or an in-law -- that only applies if the person does NOT live with you)
  3. Gross income test - He has no income at all.
  4. Support test - He lives there, eats there, has no income, etc. And assuming that he does NOT have savings that he is using i.e., the boyfriend is paying more then 50% of his friends support. So what am I missing? Why can't the boyfriend claim a dependent for his friend?

--

-Ernie-

Reply to
Ernie Klein

Ah I see now, you say "based on what you have written."

Now then, under what circumstances could he claim his friend?

ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

That's interesting because a neighbor took in an exchange student, made sure the young man arrived before December

31st and left after January 1st two years later, and got him a TIN. He deducted the sudent as a dependent for two years on his federal return.

He got nit-picker audited for those two years for another reason. His CPA, who went to the audit for him, told him the IRS auditor spent less than 30 seconds on that that issue. My neighbor is Korean, but keeps records like a German.

Anyone who has no income and lives with you for all days in a tax year is your dependent on your federal return UNLESS there is a local ordinance prohibiting the living arrangement (unmarried cohabitation).

Dick

Reply to
Dick Adams

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.