Depreciating new HVAC unit

I recently replaced the HVAC unit (condenser, coil, and furnace) in a residential rental property. Looking at the depreciation schedule, I was quite surprised to discover that this is apparently classified as
27.5 year property.
Given the basically zero chance that any residential air conditioning system will last more than 10 or 15 years, how should I handle this when I inevitably have to replace the system (or a significant component) long before it's fully depreciated?
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 7:50:19 PM UTC-4, Ian Pilcher wrote:

Depending on the tax law as it may exist at that time, you will have a method for writing off the remaining basis or adjusting the basis in the replacement equipment. About the only thing I can be certain of is that the rules in this area 10 years from now won't be the same as the current rules.
Ira Smilovitz, EA
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 9/3/2019 4:47 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:

It depends if you want to follow the LAW, or the new IRS depreciation rules. If you want to follow the LAW, you will just write this off as a repair, and not depreciate it.
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 9:41:15 AM UTC-4, Taxed and Spent wrote:

Wrong as to the LAW. The LAW presumes that the HVAC replacement is an improvement and should be capitalized unless you can meet one of the provisions in Reg 1.263(a)-3. There isn't enough information in the OP to determine whether this is an improvement or repair.
Ira Smilovitz, EA
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 9/4/2019 7:55 AM, ira smilovitz wrote:

What statute are you referring to?
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 11:11:21 AM UTC-4, Taxed and Spent wrote:

26 USC 263 and the associated reg.
Ira Smilovitz, EA
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 9/4/19 9:55 AM, ira smilovitz wrote:

It's essentially a whole new system. All of the major components were replaced, and it's higher capacity. So I'm reasonably certain that it's an improvement.
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 12:46:28 PM UTC-4, Ian Pilcher wrote:

Take a close look at the regs. While it seems that this is an improvement, there are certain situations that may allow you to elect to treat this as a repair. You will have to include the appropriate election language with your return if you wish to do so.
Ira Smilovitz, EA
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 9/4/2019 10:19 AM, ira smilovitz wrote:

I agree. Also, is this not subject to section 179 these days?
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 3:26:39 PM UTC-4, Taxed and Spent wrote:

I'm not sure. (My clientele doesn't typically have rental properties.) The new rules address building systems and components. If the HVAC system is considered a part of the building, it might not be. Otherwise, I assume it would be.
Ira Smilovitz, Ea
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 9/4/19 2:22 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:

AFAICT, section 179 elections are not available for *residential* rental properties.
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 9/4/2019 6:46 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:

bonus depreciation?
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

BeanSmart.com is a site by and for consumers of financial services and advice. We are not affiliated with any of the banks, financial services or software manufacturers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

Tax and financial advice you come across on this site is freely given by your peers and professionals on their own time and out of the kindness of their hearts. We can guarantee neither accuracy of such advice nor its applicability for your situation. Simply put, you are fully responsible for the results of using information from this site in real life situations.