How To Report Stock Exchange In Merger?

Over the years, my wife accumulated 418.619 shares of Nicor, Inc. In December
2011, Nicor was merged into AGL Resources (AGL). Each Nicor share was exchanged
for $21.20 in cash plus 0.8382 share o AGL. AGL shares were valued at $53 for
purposes of the merger.
In late December, she received a check for $8,910.74. (The difference was for
the partial Nicor share.) and 350 shares of AGL.
Question 1: How do we report this on our 2011 return? The total cost basis of
the Nicor shares was $15,575.04.
Question 2: It is likely that we will sell the AGL shares in 2012. How would
that be reported?
Would any gain be long term?
I queried Wells Fargo, which handled this transaction as to the tax
consequences. They said to
consult with our tax advisor. So here I am -- and happy to be back.
Thank you for your help.
Bill Brenner
Reply to
William Brenner
2011, Nicor was merged into AGL Resources (AGL).
AGL shares were valued at $53 for purposes of the merger.
the partial Nicor share.) and 350 shares of AGL.
of the Nicor shares was $15,575.04.
that be reported?
consequences. They said to
First, I trust you read
formatting link
(This links to the Tax Reporting Statement AGL publisher after the merger.) Next - I show AGL traded at $39.48 on 12/9/11. It never traded as high as $53. Who gave you that number?
Reply to
JoeTaxpayer
December 2011, Nicor was merged into AGL Resources (AGL).
AGL shares were valued at $53 for purposes of the merger.
for the partial Nicor share.) and 350 shares of AGL.
of the Nicor shares was $15,575.04.
would that be reported?
consequences. They said to
Based on the numbers provided, I assume the OP meant that the total consideration he received for each share of Nicor was $53, roughly $32 in stock and $21 in cash.
Ira Smilovitz Leonia, NJ
Reply to
ira smilovitz
consideration he received for each share of Nicor was $53, roughly $32 in stock and $21 in cash.
I was prepared to answer based on Ira's note, until I re-read the notice; Any gain recognized generally will be long-term capital gain if, as of the date of the merger, the shares of Nicor common stock exchanged in the transaction were held for more than one year, unless the receipt of cash has the effect of a distribution of a dividend under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, in which case such gain will be treated as a dividend to the extent of such United States holder's ratable share of the undistributed earnings and profits of Nicor.
In my experience with mergers/takeovers, these declarations of the event have always been a bit crisper, never had any doubt. This one, not so much.
Reply to
JoeTaxpayer
No, I had not seen the document. I wish they had made it more understandable for amateurs like me.
The $53 share price was included in the merger announcement. It was not intended to reflect an actual AGL price, but to reflect the "bonus" received by Nicor shareholders. Start -- as they did -- with $37.93, the closing AGL price on the day preceding the merger announcement. Multiply that by 0.8382, the share exchange ratio. Add the $21.20 cash. The result is $52.99. Close enough.
I still have Questions: For tax reporting purposes, what is the "selling price" of the Nicor shares? Is it $53? What is the cost basis for the AGL shares? Must the AGL shares be held for one year to qualify for long term treatment?
Thank you for your help
========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: I hope that linked document will help lead to a good answer.
Reply to
William Brenner
2011, Nicor was merged into AGL Resources (AGL). Each Nicor share was exchanged for $21.20 in cash plus 0.8382 share o AGL. AGL shares were valued at $53 for purposes of the merger.
the partial Nicor share.) and 350 shares of AGL.
of the Nicor shares was $15,575.04.
that be reported?
consequences. They said to
I've looked at the documentation provided by AGL
formatting link
and here's what you need to do: For each lot of Nicor stock, determine whether the value received ($54.33/share) is more than your cost basis for that lot.
1) If the value received is less than your cost basis for the Nicor shares, your cost basis in these AGL shares will be your cost basis in the Nicor shares less the cash received ($21.20/share).
2) If the value received is more than your cost basis for the Nicor shares and your cost basis in that lot of Nicor shares is more than $33.23, you recognize a capital gain for the difference between the value received and your cost basis. Your cost basis in the AGL shares will be $33.23 for each 0.8382 shares ($39.64/share).
3) If the value received is more than your cost basis for the Nicor shares and your cost basis in that lot of Nicor shares is $33.23 or less, you recognize a capital gain of $21.20 on each share of Nicor. Your cost basis in the each of the AGL shares from this lot will be your cost basis in each of the Nicor shares in this lot/0.8382.
Capital gains will be short-term or long-term based on the acquisition date of the Nicor shares. The holding period for the AGL shares will be same as that of the Nicor shares.
Finally, after you complete all of this, you will probably have a fractional share of AGL. That will have been sold and you will receive a small amount of cash-in-lieu. This is reported as a separate sale using the earliest Nicor purchase date.
Ira Smilovitz Leonia, NJ
Reply to
ira smilovitz
Ira --
Thank you for your analysis of the AGI document and your take on what I should do.
There is a problem. The 418 Nicor shares were obtained via dividend reinvestment on a monthly or semi monthly basis starting in 1995. There are 179 transactions, many for partial shares and the rest for anywhere from 1+ to 4 Shares. It took me several hours to add up the last 418 shares and to extend the cost basis for each transaction. I cannot imagine the time and paper space necessary to process each lot and to report the results. (I had obtained a printout from Nicor that listed the transactions by date, the number of shares purchased and cost basis of the shares.)
The majority of the shares have cost bases of more than $33.23 but less than the value received. Can I lump these together and lump together those shares with cost bases less than $33.23? I would lump the latter shares first and then subtract the result from the totals to obtain the lump sums of the former shares. Doing it that way would ensure that I would have a result prior to April 17. [GRIN]
There are only 3 transactions in which the value received was less than the cost bases, but these occurred in 2011, and would be reported separately as short term losses.
Thanks again for your excellent help.
Bill Brenner
Reply to
William Brenner
reinvestment on a monthly or semi monthly basis starting in 1995. There are 179 transactions, many for partial shares and the rest for anywhere from 1+ to 4 Shares. It took me several hours to add up the last 418 shares and to extend the cost basis for each transaction. I cannot imagine the time and paper space necessary to process each lot and to report the results. (I had obtained a printout from Nicor that listed the transactions by date, the number of shares purchased and cost basis of the shares.)
the value received. Can I lump these together and lump together those shares with cost bases less than $33.23? I would lump the latter shares first and then subtract the result from the totals to obtain the lump sums of the former shares. Doing it that way would ensure that I would have a result prior to
cost bases, but these occurred in 2011, and would be reported separately as short term losses.
I was going to begin my previous reply with "First, pour yourself a stiff drink." You know what the strict interpretation of the rules is. However, if it were my problem, I would probably take the easy way out and lump similar transactions together as you propose.
Ira Smilovitz Leonia, NJ
Reply to
ira smilovitz
Ira --
Thank you. Thank you. I promise to not quote you if questioned regarding lumping. I have had that stiff drink -- perhaps 2 -- in celebration of your thought.
One more (I hope) question: Under paragraph 3) of your instructions, what do I enter in Schedule D column (d) (Sales Price) in order for the gain to equal $21.20 per Nicor share? The only way I can think of is to show the sale price as $21.20 per share more than the cost basis. But that does not accurately reflect the actual sales price -- or does it? (I assume that the cost basis will be as calculated;)
***************************************************************************************************** MR MODERATOR:: I am back at MTM after a too long absence and am most impressed by the snazzy new format. Would you please give me a brief lesson on how to have the post to which I am replying appear in my reply. Also, how to have my name appear in place of "me". I believe you have my e-mail address. Thank you.
Reply to
William Brenner
lumping. I have
I enter in
Nicor share?
than the cost
I would take a simpler approach. I would list the sales price as $21.20 per share with $0 cost basis and describe the transaction as "Gain due to merger of Nicor and AGL".
*****************************************************************************************************
impressed by the snazzy new format. Would you please give me a brief lesson on how to have the post to which I am replying
believe you have my
There is no need to do anything. "Me" only appears when you look at your own posts. I see "me" for my posts and William Brenner for yours.
Ira Smilovitz Leonia, NJ
Reply to
ira smilovitz

Site Timeline Threads

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.