Married filing Separately -- where to put shared items?

After crunching some numbers I have figured out that it MIGHT work out better if my wife and I file as "Married Filing Separately" (she has several part time jobs which significantly under-withheld based on our combined income).

We have a few shared items in both of our names, including:

-Mortgage Interest

-Property Taxes

-A small amount of 1099-misc income

-A small amount of savings interest

What are our options for these items when filing separately? Specifically...

-Can we put them on whichever return we prefer (depending on what works out to the least tax liabliity)?

-Can we "split them up" -- e.g. put half of the mortgage interest on mine, half on hers? or in a 60/40, etc. split?

-Are there any regulations for how to divide them (e.g. do property taxes and mortgage interest have to be on the same return?)

-Do we have to somehow document on one return that the "missing items" are on the spouse's return?

Any advice would be appreciated.

Reply to
CallMeZoot
Loading thread data ...

That alone is usually not enough to make MFS better than MFJ. How much of an advantage does your initial estimate lead to? Are you losing credits and subject to stricter limitations under MFS?

No. First, if you are in a community property state, special rules apply -- in short, community income is split 50-50 regardless of who it originated with. Second, income belongs to the person who either earned it or owns the property which generated it, so that is what is reported on each person's return. Third, deductions belong to the person who owed the money and who actually paid it out of their own funds. (Exceptions apply, but that's the general principle).

It would be a good idea.

-Mark Bole

Reply to
Mark Bole

If you live in a "community property state" (there are 15 of them), then your split is pretty much mandated at 50% each for every item mentioned per state law.

Otherwise, the 1099-Misc income belongs to the ONE wh is the sole-proprietor. The other items may be split as you see fit. By indicating MFS and identifying your spouse, you've done all you need to do regarding the "missing items" issue.

Reply to
D. Stussy

CallMeZoot at snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote on 2/2/08 4:00 PM:

If you are both on the loan, allocate it any way you wish.

If you jointly hold title to the property, anyway you wish.

If self employment it should be whoever owns the business. If gambling winnings, it should go with the gambler.

If joint account it can go either way but you should report it under the SSN that reported it to the IRS and then subtract it out with a comment transferring it to the other SSN. Then report it on the other person's return.

yes

yes

no

Yes, if they were reported to the IRS on a 1099 type form. The IRS will look for them where reported.

All freely provided advice guarantee correct or double your money back

Frank S. Duke, Jr. CPA Cincinnati, OH USA

Reply to
Frank S. Duke, Jr.

D. Stussy wrote: [...]

Wrong, there are nine. See Pub 555.

-Mark Bole

Reply to
Mark Bole

  1. California
  2. Idaho
  3. Louisiana
  4. Nevada
  5. New Mexico
  6. Texas
  7. Washington
  8. Wisconsin

What are the other 6?

Bob Sandler

Reply to
Bob Sandler

Brain freeze here. You're right. I was thinking of "common law" states - of which there are 15.

Reply to
D. Stussy

[...]

The first problem with this is, since information on MFS returns is not necessarily available to the other spouse, how could one arbitrarily split up income and deductions and ensure they are not double-reported?

See Table 1 in Pub 504 (page 5, for 2007 tax year). There are indeed rules for dividing Schedule A deductions on MFS returns.

-Mark Bole

Reply to
Mark Bole

If we want to get technical... the Nati "Currently, only 10 states (Alabama, Colorado, Kansas, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Iowa, Montana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Texas) and the District of Columbia recognize common-law marriages contracted within their borders. In addition, five states have "grandfathered" common law marriage, allowing those established before a certain date to be recognized. New Hampshire recognizes common law marriage only for purposes of probate, and Utah recognizes common law marriages only if they have been validated by a court or administrative order."

Reply to
Alan

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.