In article , katiej snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com (Katie) writes: | On May 21, 6:28 am, jeffdo123 wrote: | > I probably should talk to a tax attorney on this but wondering if | > someone can give me advice. | >
| > I have been working out of my home in New Hampshire as a consultant | > for 5+ years, for a company based in Massachusets. (I go into Mass | > maybe one or twice a year for meetings, that is all.) | >
| > All this time I have been paying state income tax, recently the | > company that I have been consulting for hired me permanently and HR | > thinks I shouldn't be paying income tax. I called the Mass department | > of revenue and they said I should because the company is based in | > Mass. | >
| > Which doesn't make alot of sense to me. Is it worth fighting them on | > this? If I win could I get back the five years of income tax they have | > collected that they didn't have any right to? | >
| >
| | As someone else pointed out, if you were working for a NY employer and | spending some time at its NY location, all of your earnings would be | subject to NY tax under the infamous "convenience of the employer" | rule. Fortunately, as far as I know Massachusetts is not on the short | list of states that apply that rule or something similar (Delaware and | Pennsylvania being examples). I believe you can file amended returns | for years that are open under the statute of limitations. And get | your employer to stop withholding MA tax on your salary, except to the | extent that you perform the services in Massachusetts.
At some point does NH start wanting Business Enterprise Tax? Seems like avoiding both state's taxes by having the company in MA with employees working in NH is too good to be true. :)
Dan Lanciani ddl@danlan.*com