non deductable IRA contributions

a taxpayer has a high income, let's say $400k AGI.

Can he make non-deductible contributions to a traditional IRA? If so, he must deal with form 8606, as noted in other recent threads. If he makes a withdrawal before the magic age (I forget the age, but this guy is in his

50s), are their penalties applicable, and must the withdrawal be pro-rated between the deductible contributions (made earlier, when he was not as well off) and the non-deductible contributions?

I guess these details are soliciting the answer to this broader question: are there meaningful tax advantages to be had by a high AGI guy via IRAs?

Not familiar with Roths, I don't even know the questions to ask in a similar vein for this guy.

Reply to
Gil Faver
Loading thread data ...

Regardless of income, if he has no retirement account at work, he can take the deduction. I'll assume he does have a 401(k), so it's not deductible.

Yes, he can make the non-deductible contribution to the IRA.

As someone one corrected me, your guy has only one IRA, regardless of the number of accounts they are in. Non-deducted deposits are tracked via 8606 as you note. Any withdrawal (or Roth conversion, for that matter) is pro-rated between pre and post tax deposits.

The obvious advantage is the tax deferral on the growth. A potential advantage comes in 2010, maybe, when we might be able to convert, regardless of income, to a Roth IRA. One trick (legal, of course) is to roll all pretax funds into the 401(k) account, so only post tax money is available for Roth conversion, and no tax due. Did I cover your question? Miss anything?

Joe

Reply to
joetaxpayer

a couple of points. first, he has no earned income, so he cannot take the deduction. Second, your point about only having one traditional IRA regardless of the number of accounts is a good one. And due to his AGI, he is precluded from a Roth IRA.

So, I guess he can put money into a traditional IRA, nondeductibly.

Will he be penalized for early withdrawal, even to the proportion of his nondeductible contributions?

Reply to
Gil Faver

In article , Gil Faver >>

Ah, additional and quite critical information. Best to include it in original post.

In order to contribute to either a Roth or a traditional IRA, you must have at least that much Taxable Compensation.

Taxable Compensation includes wages, self employment, certain farming and fishing income, bonuses, tips, severance pay and, for IRAs, it also includes alimony income.

It does not include interet, dividends, capital gains, gambling winnings, rental income, social secuity, IRA distributions or pensions.

So if there is no Taxable Compensation there is no allowed IRA contribution.

N/A

Reply to
Arthur Kamlet

No earned income = no IRA deposit of any kind. I'm sorry, when you said $400K AGI, I assumed. My bad. If he is under 59-1/2 he has a penalty for early withdrawal, yes.

Joe

Reply to
joetaxpayer

ah, when I said $400k AGI, I was ambiguous . . .

thanks for the refresher, all.

Reply to
Gil Faver

Arthur Kamlet wrote: [...]

[...]

There is the exception of the IRA contribution allowed for the spouse with no earned income of their own, based on the other spouse's earned income, but it would still probably be non-deductible in this case due to AGI.

No, not really, in my opinion. Because of the special rules coming up about conversions from non-deductible Traditional IRA's to Roth regardless of AGI, you could tuck away maybe an extra $5 or $10K into a Roth, but that's about it.

-Mark Bole

Reply to
Mark Bole

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.