We own a commercial space that is used as a simple rental warehouse. Normally, a simple Schedule E handles the income/expenses. Last year, we put a new roof on the entire building. How is that normally reported/handled ?
The new proposed and temporary regulations (very similar to the old proposes regs but with a lotmore detailand examples) makes it pretty clear that replacing a roof is a capital improvement and not a repair.
Some quotes and cites from the Treasury Regs:
Accordingly, if an amount paid results in a restoration of a building structure, such as the replacement of an entire roof, then under the temporary regulations the expenditure constitutes an improvement to the building unit of property.
See, for example, Smith v. Commissioner, 300 F.3d 1023 (9th Cir. 2002) (holding that costs to replace a substantial portion of floor were capital expenditures); Tsakopoulous v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-8 (holding that costs to replace the roof on a portion of the suites of a shopping center were capital expenditures);
Georgia Car and Locomotive Co., 2 B.T.A. 986 (1925) (holding that costs of a new roof on a building were capital expenditures). The approach for buildings is conceptually similar to the plant property rule discussed below, which segregates plant property into units of property that perform discrete and major functions within the plant.
Interesting.... will have to check and see what was really completed. Of course, the "new roof" work would be exactly the same in either case, just the difference being in the removal of the old roof.... and since this was a classic commercial building with a flat roof, underlayer, gravel, etc... not even sure what "removing the old roof" would entail.
SO - why is one effort considered a capex and the other an expense ?
I am not aware of any Tax Court decision in 2003 that under the law may be cited as precedent. I am aware of a TCM decision on this issue... but that can't be cited as precedent. I am only aware of TC decisions and Circuit Court decisions that are consistent with the 2008 proposed regulations and would be consistent with the 2011 temporary and proposed regulations.
BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.