Very confused about reporting IRA->Roth transactions on Income Tax

Feb 04, 2009 3 Replies

In 2008, I had the following transactions (all with Fidelity):



Convert IRA to Roth...........................100,000 Return of excess contributions...............5,000 Recharacterized Roth back to IRA.......50,000



I did the return of excess because I realized that I had forgotten to take my minimum required distribution before converting. I did the partial recharacterization because I realized I wouldn't have enough cash to pay the resulting income taxes. Because of losses, the amount Fidelity actually withdrew and returned to me was $4,500. Because of losses, the amount they actually transferred back into my IRA for the recharacterization was $45,000.



I usually do my own income taxes, but I'm very confused about what to report how and where in filling out my income tax. Can someone out there give me a clue? Are there any tax consequences to the losses?



Thanks in advance.


Use form 8606 to report conversions, recharacterizations, and non- deductible contributions. Do you do it yourself using a computer program or write into the forms directly? The loss is deductible only if close out all of your traditional IRAs, and the loss is only allowed on your non-deductible contributions, and the loss is subject to the 2% of AGI rule (only the loss over 2% of your AGI is deductible), and the loss is not allowed under AMT (ie. so it may increase your AMT tax). See

formatting link
an explanation.

But the conversion amount recharacterized should still be $100K under most circumstances (did you have other contributions or distributions during the calculation period from conversion date to recharacterization date?)

You could do more research, or hire a professional. It's not likely that your 1099-R forms alone will resolve everything, a statement to the IRS with your return will most likely be required.

formatting link
for an explanation.>

You should re-read the article you posted. It's not common to have a basis in a Trad. IRA, so what loss are you talking about?

-Mark Bole

Sorry, upon re-reading I see your statement above is accurate, but I don't think it applies at all to the OP's situation. He apparently doesn't have, and isn't concerned about, a deductible loss. What he is trying to accomplish with the recharacterization, is to not pay tax in the first place on conversion income that has since evaporated.

-Mark Bole

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required