How is it that BRK has PP&E but no depreciation expenses?

Jan 21, 2010 6 Replies

First reply

Bill Reid

I believe it still must be reported for the purposes of calculating the income statement. It is not a "loss", but an expense that can be amortized over time under law. Here's another guess: everything is fully depreciated already? Or reported as an expense without amortizing…

Read the full reply

Berkshire Hathaway has 52,657,000 in Property Plant and Equipment. However, they don't have one dollar in depreciation expenses. What's up with this?


Wild-ass guess: Depreciation is a tax issue. It is not a real loss.

Vito

I believe it still must be reported for the purposes of calculating the income statement. It is not a "loss", but an expense that can be amortized over time under law.

Here's another guess: everything is fully depreciated already? Or reported as an expense without amortizing it? What's the deal with all these questions? Don't you realize that the whole "system" is just a fraud designed to steal the working man's labor?

2.7182818284590... wrote

Presumably its almost all property/real estate etc which is not depreciable.

Bill Reid wrote on 1/20/10 11:42 PM:

Is this "Crazy Bob" MBA????

Very good answer. I didn't think of that. This is why you're a value- added member of sci.econ and other newsgroups. However, some times, you make snarky and anti-intellectual comments. Thanks.

2.7182818284590... wrote

I piss on bullshit and lies from a great height.

No problem.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required