Newbie question about cash flow statements, and also about common stock.

Jul 26, 2007 8 Replies

Why it is standard in the US to release individual quarterly data for net income, but accumulative data for the entire year in quarterly cash flow statements?



Also, I was under the impression that the only way to increase common stock on the balance sheet, for a publicly traded company, is to sell stock. How else is this done? According to MSN Money, Microsoft had its common stock go from about 32 to 49 billion in FY 2002, while increasing outstanding shares by only about 50 million which suggest an increase in common stock of only 1.4 billion.



Regards, James



Stock can be issued to purchase assets or pay expenses. Stock issuance doesn't always result in cash. Take a look at how CEO's are paid.

Rocinante, thats true, but I think I've asked the question the wrong way. Let me rephrase: I was under the impression that the only way to increase common stock on the balance sheet is to increase the number of outstanding shares in the company. Stock issued for purchases or for employee payment would increase the outstanding shares, right? Microsoft oustanding shares only increased by roughly 50 million in FY

2002 according to MSN Money. During that year, the stock traded around $27 per share. That implies they issued roughly $1.4 billion in stock for 2002. However, the common stock value they report on their balance sheet increased by $18 billion! Where did the other 17 billion in common stock come from, if not from increasing the number of shares outstanding?

James

Isn't common stock reported at par value instead of the fmv of $27 per share? Take a look at the paid-in-capital account (if it's reported). That is where the $17 billion is accounted for.

"Rocinante" wrote

Yup. There should be an adjustment to additional paid in capital (or some similar equity account) for the difference between par and market.

Rocinate, I appreciate your responses. Unfortunately, I don't see a paid-in-capital or similar row. I was under the assumption if there is no additional paid-in-capital line that there is no par value for the stock. Here is a direct link to the MSFT data. Total shares outstanding listed after the Total Liabilities & SE line, and right- most column is 2002 number:

formatting link
Is the MSN data correctly formatted? And, is it the case that if you increase paid-in-capital or common stock that you are always deriving additional assets or paying expenses by giving up a stake in the company in return?

Regards, James

formatting link

The link you posted shows a more condensed balance sheet. The common stock and additional paid-in-capital accounts are combined into one line.

Here is a more fleshed out balance sheet from MS annual report that has more disclosure:

formatting link
It would be foolish for MS or any corporation not to declare a low par value in its charter.

Companies leverage their equity quite often, but not past a point where they lose control.

disclosure:

formatting link

Rocinate, even in the data you link to, I don't see how common stock & APIC number works. When you issue common stock, the common stock & APIC amount increases, correct? If that is true, then upon re- purchasing stock, shouldn't common stock & APIC always decrease? In the FY2006 Microsoft re-purchased 17 billion worth of stock according to the link you provided. Yet, common stock & APIC went from 60B to

59B. Shouldn't common stock & APIC have gone down by a much larger number?

More importantly, does the common stock & APIC number mean that as of

2006 Microsoft received a total of 59 billion worth of assets in return for a stake in the company?

Regards, James

disclosure:

formatting link
>

When a company buys back its own stock, it is then called "treasury stock." The treasury stock account is debited and the cash account is credited in such a transaction. APIC is not involved until the company re-sells the stock above or below cost. If the selling price equals the cost, then you would just debit cash and credit treasury stock. APIC is used to make up the difference between cost and selling price when selling stock.

Yes. I always thought it was a "cool" advantage that both corporations and investors enjoyed.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required