Not of Interest? But how?

Aether is of interest to material scientists because they will study the properties of this exotic material. Aether is of interest to investors because of opportunities for investment in novel aether technologies. Aether is of interest to engineers because they will be the ones to actualize these technologies. Aether is of interest to chemists because of its subtle energy influence chemical reactions. Aether is of interest to Kibologists because of its potential in mind control and mass social engineering. Aether is of interest to Mensa members because they have responsibility to make use of their intellect in this field. Aether should be of interest to physicists and relativists, but they are to arrogant to be a help to mankind anymore. They must see the face of their failure. They will see the face of their failure.

NO PHYSICIST can prove me wrong so i will post it again:

Scientists deny galaxies moving apart in space. They say space is expanding, not galaxies moving apart. But in the same gasp they say that your frame of reference is OK. So why is the frame of reference where galaxies move apart is not OK. I'll tell you why. Because expanding space is an aether. Relative to the aether there is absolute motion. This is the only thing that can give the galaxies absolute rest, and space absolute fast expansion. IT'S A FACT.

-- Nth Complexity -- "The teaching of science and mathematics must be purged of its authoritarian and elitist characteristics, and the content of these subjects enriched by incorporating the insights of the feminist, queer, multiculturalist and ecological critiques." -- A.D.S.

Reply to
Nth Complexity
Loading thread data ...

Hardly likely as it has never been detected.

You have been proven wrong - bur like the flat earthers you simply claim it has not been proven.

They do not deny this.

It is the explanation for galaxies moving apart.

Any FOR is as good as any other.

Rest of rubbish mercifully snipped.

Bill

Reply to
Bill Hobba

Its staring you in the face all the time Bill. If you measure the speed of anything you have to have a physical reference to make your measurement a physical reality out side your head. If you wish to throw away all the significant zeros in your head that's fine but the significant zero's outside your head will still remain. So your posting appear to be incoherent to those who can see and feel the significant zero's. You have become mathematically brain damaged get treatment. I am only trying to help you. If you reply we will run an example to try and show you your incoherence if you are not to far gone.

-- D & R *** E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field, two unbound field effects

formatting link
updates. The spuds, beans and onions are coming up nicely. Oohah.{:-)

Reply to
*** rD

message

So you think you have seen something all the innumerable people who have studied relatively are unable to see? The condition is most likely a result of delusion and should be treated.

It is called a coordinate system.

You are, as usual, prattling incoherent drivel.

Malicious crossposts removed and follow-ups set correctly.

Bill

Reply to
Bill Hobba

| > Its staring you in the face all the time Bill. | | So you think you have seen something all the innumerable people who have | studied relatively are unable to see? The condition is most likely a result | of delusion and should be treated.

AE saw it and wrote it down but there is non so blind as those who have no wish to see.

| | > If you measure the speed of | > anything you have to have a physical reference to make your measurement a | > physical reality out side your head. | | It is called a coordinate system.

Be real that just in your head, reality has no markers except the ones you apply. That sort of statement just makes your case laughable, try not to make them.

| | > If you wish to throw away all the | > significant zeros in your head that's fine but the significant zero's | > outside your head will still remain. So your posting appear to be | incoherent | > to those who can see and feel the significant zero's. You have become | > mathematically brain damaged get treatment. I am only trying to help you. | If | > you reply we will run an example to try and show you your incoherence if | you | > are not to far gone. | | You are, as usual, prattling incoherent drivel.

This is not very convincing as to some at least my postings make some sense and your claim of incoherence is clearly a case of incomprehension on your part at the most charitable interpretation.

Usually you snip my posts and make some comment as above so I have only a faint hope that you will even read the following.

The speed of light is measured on the moon and on the earth. There is a velocities between them. In one they measure the speed of light as c as they do in the other so both places measure the speed of light at c. There is a velocity difference between the moon and the earth so the start point for their measurement must be different if they both measure the speed of light at c. The zero reference that the moon uses is not the same as the one the earth uses as it cannot be if there is a velocity difference between the two places and the same effect is measured at the same value. So the moon zero is not the same as the earth zero with respect to c and this to maintain mathematical coherence.

| | Malicious crossposts removed and follow-ups set correctly. | | Bill |

You had already been posting to a whole range of groups earlier in this thread but thanks for removing sci.physics. I have reset the follow-ups to include what feel is an appropriate posting group for you if your unable to understand the simple example above. Btw I have not introduced any malicious cross posting before and including this post so speak for yourself as the records show.

-- Significant Zero E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field, two unbound field effects

formatting link
updates. The spuds, beans and onions are coming up nicely. Oohah.{:-)

Reply to
Significant Zero

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.