Professionally managed 401K?

The company I work for has a typical 401k plan with about 15-20 mutual funds to choose from, with various concentrations (growth, value, international, bonds, money market etc.). The selection is ok, but it could be better. The company that handles our 401k (Nationwide) signed up with Wilshire Associates, and are now providing what they call a "pro" account. Getting talent like that at Wilshire to manage your money usually takes a lot of money (like large pension plans). They would be handling my asset allocation, rebalancing my account, etc. They would have access to more funds then I currently have. Cost?

1.35%. Is it worth it?

I'm trying to get as much feedback before I make up my mind.

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
49ermike
Loading thread data ...

I trust the funds have their own expense, perhaps 1%?

The extra fee isn't likely to enhance your return beyond the expense of the fee. Does your company match any of your deposits? What are the fees of these funds? Are some lower than others? For my 401(k), the S&P index is crazy low, .05%. The foreign funds, not so good. So in my allocation, the S&P goes into the 401(k) and other sectors go into the IRA accounts.

Joe

formatting link

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
joetaxpayer

wrote

What other fund in particular would you like? Fifteen to 20 funds with the basic areas covered sounds plenty fine. If there is some other fund you really want, is it possible to invest in it via a Traditional or Roth IRA, or even taxable account?

1.35% is steep and reduces your returns meaningful over ten years. I would experiment with all the free online asset allocators linked at
formatting link
. Note the differences. Ask yourself, "Is this really such an exact science?" If after reading more you think not, then do your own asset allocation and rebalancing, once a year.

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
Elle

There is a lot of information that is needed before any useful input can be given. Early thoughts:

  1. That's a pretty high fee for what really isn't much work beyond the initial asset plan. Most plans make rebalancing easy, and with slicing of contributions rebalancing isn't even necessary much of the time. With a taxable account, a manager can stay on top of tax-loss harvesting, but that's not applicable here. What is this person going to do to earn that kind of fee?
  2. What kind of plan is the manager going to come up with? An index-based approach emphasizing low fees, or trying to identify hot fund managers? This talk of "expertise" sounds somewhat ominous. What allocation plan do you have now, and how did you come up with it?
  3. How bad are your current selections, and how great are the additional funds? Some fund names/tickers or information would be useful.
  4. Do you have significant investments outside of the 401(k)? Portfolios should normally be considered as a whole. Part of portfolio management is getting the right assets in tax-advantaged versus taxable accounts. Will this manager take that into account when creating the allocation?

Brian

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
Default User

The vast majority of professional stock/fund pickers do worse than the market over the long term, and paying them an extra 1.35% is an extra insult. In my opinion, find one broad index fund if you have one, such as that covers the S&P500 or wilshire 5000, and put all your stock allocation in it, and be happy. Put whatever portion you want in bonds, in a broad bond index if possible. How old are you? If young, most if not all should be in stocks.

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
joeDOTweinsteinATgmailDOTcom

Is that 1.35% on TOP of the mutual fund management fees for the funds they'd use for your portfolio?

That's pretty expensive. Maybe cheap for a very small managed account, but overall very expensive.

What funds (and at what expenses) do you have available to you if you don't go with these guys?

Reply to
BreadWithSpam

There are lots of free allocation tools on the web.

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
PeterL

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.