Rental Property Depreciation for Current/Previous Year

Feb 21, 2007 3 Replies

I am a first time landlord and rented our previous home in September-2005. When I filed my taxes last year, I did not depreciate. My perception (or rather misunderstanding) was that if I claim depreciation, that will be decreased from the cost basis of the property and hence "reduce the buying price" and hence increase my effective profit when I sell the property in future years, hence increase my tax liability when I decide to sell the property. As it turns out, I was wrong. Based on the information that I have read on the internet, it seems that the depreciation will anyway be deducted and taxed when I sell the property whether or not I have claimed it in the past years or not. Please correct me if I am wrong here. I have read some IRS publications regarding depreciation but have not been able to get the answers that I need. I have the following questions and would appreciate if you can either point me to a resource, previous posts or please answer this question for me.



  1. Is depreciation taxed when I sell the property even if I do not claim it in previous years is correct or wrong?
  2. Can I claim the depreciation for previous year (since I did not claim it then)? In my case, the home was rented for only 4 months in

2005. If so, what form shoudl I be using to do that?
  1. From previous question, if I am not able to claim the depreciation for the previous year (2005), will it automatically be deducted from cost basis when I sell the home in the future?
  2. Is it actually better in some scenarios to not claim depreciation and let it lower the cost basis in the year of sale to claim a lower tax rate/liability then (if it indeed is lower, I am not sure)? I seem to have read

I would appreciate any responses in this regard



Olivia



That is correct. Basis is reduced by allowable depreciation, whether or not is was claimed.

Sure. Just amend last year's return.

Moot, since you can amend the 2005 return to claim it.

I can't see how. The result on sale of will be the same either way (since basis is reduced by depreciation even if it is not claimed), and not claiming depreciation will give you higher taxes in the interim.

True, but depreciation is not *optional*. When you place a unit in service as a rental, you must take depreciation. At worse, it should be a wash, look at the tax savings on the depreciation taken, and put that money aside. When you sell, recaptured depreciation is taxed at a favorable rate, so you should have more money squirreled away than tax liability on the sale.

JOE JoeTaxpayer.com

wow, didn't know that. good to know.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required