Variable annuities not so bad?

Oct 23, 2008 3 Replies

In the past, Moshe Milevsky has been an outspoken critic of variable annuities. He's singing a different tune now. What changes in VAs do you think changed his mind, and is he right?



From

formatting link



----------------- If today's variable annuities looked like the product of the same name



10 years ago, I'd still be opposed to them. They used to promise to make up losses only if you died while the market was down.

But the new ones deliver benefits you can claim while you're still alive. And the protection they provide against market losses would be very expensive if you tried to buy it some other way - say, in the options market.



So I used to be something of a crusader against variable annuities, but now I fall back on what the economist John Maynard Keynes said when someone challenged him for supposedly flip-flopping. "When the facts change," he said, "I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"



------------------


-Will



william dot trice at ngc dot com


-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.



Jean Keener

formatting link
Keller, TX

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

You are correct that he's talking about the guaranted life benefit riders. Here's a link to a google-cached version of a post I made on the subject at Fundalarm: http://64.233.169.104/search?qÊche:_GBBrZiTYmAJ:66.223.18.76/wwwboard/messages/234094.html (In case that doesn't work, here's the link I included in that post to a relevant working paper by Milevsky and Kyrychenco, "Asset Allocation within Variable Annuities: The Impact of Guarantees", Version June 28, 2007"

formatting link
) As to whether he's right, he's concerned that the riders are priced too low, not too high (see links above)

Mark Freeland snipped-for-privacy@nyc.rr.com

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

I know someone who baought one three years wrapped around a lifecycle account. The overheads of both accounts is .3%, less than some managed mutual funds. However, it is below purchase value now and the investor wont be able to take a loss on that should they withdraw this year. On the positive side there is no income tax or early withdrawal penalty on widthdrawal of principal only.

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required