Where to invest my SEP?

Thanks to all the fantastic replies , I went ahead and opened a SEP with Fidelity. Based on my business income I calculated I can invest

8k per year. I would like to put in something aggressive as my 401k is conservatively invested and I want to diversity. The problem is fidelity has hundreds of mutual funds, CD's, bonds etc to choose from! How do I go about finding a simple index fund that is aggressive? Seems like with so much choice I just feel overwhelmed and do not do anything.

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
nonsense
Loading thread data ...

I'd consider putting the bulk of it into low fee funds. Index funds would be a good choice. The task then is which index to follow.

Beyond that, pick a few sectors that you want to be in, like big cap, mid-cap, small-cap, international, etc. Look for funds with low loads, low fees, but have good long term track records.

You are never going to be able to predict the future, so spread it around a bit, and spread individual sectors across

2 or more funds in the event that one fund messes up.

-john-

Reply to
John A. Weeks III

Fidelity gives you access to *lots* of stuff. You can ignore the vast majority of it.

Fidelity has some excellent *very* low-fee index funds. Unfortnately, their "Spartan" line - which includes some excellent index funds with fees as low as 0.10% - have $10,000 minimums, so they may not be immediately accessible to you if you've just opened the account.

Just to help keep terminology clear, I'd refer to those as "asset classes" rather than "sectors". "Sectors" seems to be more commonly used to refer to specific industries rather than wider asset classes and I'd steer most folks, especially with smaller portfolios and/or less experience, away from sector funds (ie. "telecommunications" "health care" etc).

Until you have enough to easily satisfy minimums on several funds, it may be easiest to just stick to one or two very broadly diversified ones. In a retirement account, there are no tax consequences for rebalancing and/or splitting into more funds later on if you stick with no-transaction-fee funds. (A taxable account may be a bit tricker to manage that transition).

"It's hard to make predictions, especially about the future" -- Yogi Berra (or was it Mark Twain or Neils Bohr?)

Until you have enough to pass the minimums in several funds, that can be tricky. You can start with something very highly diversified, like the Fidelity Four-In-One Index fund, which has 0.08% expenses and invests in a larg-cap index, a small cap index, an international index, and (15% in) a bond index. After you've built up enough to get into low-cost single-asset-class indices like, just for example, the Fidelity Spartan Total Market index, you can then move and split the investment up in your own way easily enough.

Otherwise, one can buy multiple asset classes via several ETFs, and with very very low expense ratios - but there are transaction fees, so it's best to built up a bunch of cash and make fewer, larger buys than to buy a little bit at a time.

Vanguard's indices have $3,000 minimums, but if you buy them from inside a Fidelity account, you'll pay horrible transaction costs. To get them without those costs, you have to buy them directly from Vanguard which may be a bit of a hassle. (Vanguard's ETFs, of course, are as easily accessible from a Fidelity account as from anywhere else).

Reply to
BreadWithSpam

An excellent suggestion, and I like the fund. However, do keep in mind the costs. They're not huge, but are several times the 0.08% you suggest.

0.08% is the fee that Fidelity layers _on top of_ the underlying index funds. (It also represents a voluntary waiver of expenses; without that waiver, the fee would be slightly higher, at 0.10%.) The average expense of the underlying funds is 0.13%, so the total expense ratio for this fund is 0.23% (or 0.21% if one considers the voluntary waiver).

Just as important is that until you get over $10K, you've got an annual fee of $10, which on the $8K SEP account amounts to an additional 0.125%, for a total expense ratio of around 0.33%.

Just as Vanguard Admiral shares are just another, albeit cheaper, share class of the same fund as Vanguard Investor shares, Vanguard ETFs are a cheaper still share class of the same fund. If you hold the ETFs long enough (could be decades), the small improvement in expense fees could more than make up for the commission of buying them.

FWIW, once you own a transaction fee fund at Fidelity (i.e. pay $75! for the first purchase) , you can buy more shares for a $5 fee (which is less than the ETF commission fee). You do this by setting up an "automatic periodic purchase" of the shares, and then cancel after a single purchase. If you're interested in actively managed funds, this approach can come out cheaper in the long run than buying a no-transaction fee (NTF) fund, since the lower cost funds usually have transaction fees at Fidelity.

In the international arena, the typical open end international index fund (including Fidelity's) invests in developed markets only (tracking the EAFE index). That excludes Canada and emerging markets. You can add these to your mix once you have enough money in the pot (e.g. Fidelity Canada, Vanguard Emerging Markets VWO), or you can buy an all world or all world ex-US index from the start (e.g. Vanguard's VT and VEU ETFs respectively).

Mark Freeland snipped-for-privacy@nyc.rr.com

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
Mark Freeland

Of course, you're right. My mistake. (And Morningstar's, for what it's worth - they show it as 0.08 and a footnote claims that it *includes* underlying fund expenses, which surprised me, but not enough to make me double check it). But Fidelity themselves shows the composite ER at 0.23%.

And now that I think of it, the minimum in FFNOX is $10,000 also. It's Vanguard's fund of index funds, their STAR fund, which has the very low minimum of $1000 (and a similar expense ratio, but more conservative asset allocation)

Again, more good details and thanks for adding them. Of course, if he goes this route rather than, say, ETFs, he'll pass that $10k mark pretty quickly and after that have no $10 or per-transaction costs at all. FFNOX looks better and better, at least as a core holding which can be supplemented with some smaller additional ones later on if he wants to modify his asset allocation weights or add other asset classes unrepresented by it.

Tricky, a little messy, but smart. I got hit twice with that $75 fee a while back.

[snip excellent observations about international funds, etc]
Reply to
BreadWithSpam

my current Fidelity IRA selections are: FFNOX as suggested - 4 funds - FDGRX & FFIDX for potential growth FSEAX still holding for SE Asia FEMKX still holding for emerging markets FDFFX looking for capital appreciation also had FEQIX, but exchanged that into FFIDX

-------------------------------------- Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup.

Reply to
ps56k

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.