accidental IRA distribution

Ouch! I had 50K shares of a restricted (but legend has been lifted) stock in a Merrill IRA. I tried to transfer the shares to a different IRA with a different vendor. I then closed/canceled the Merrill account because there was nothing left there. Unfortunately, the "new" IRA vendor did not accept resctricted shares and they sent them back to Merrill a few days later. Merrill then sent me a certificate (at least I assume it was Merrill...someone did) for the 50K shares which was misunderstood/misplaced/whatever. This was all done in late April 2006. Unfortunately, I've only today (November 2006) figured out what the hell transpired and unbeknownst to me i've taken a distribution from the IRA! I "found" the stock cert today. I obviuosly have not used the proceeds from the so-called distribution, and i most certainly did not intend to take one. It is my responsiblity in the end (should have paid more attention to what was happening with my accounts) but I was not clued in to what was happening all that clearly either. I stopped listening to all the bad news from my tax man part way through his speech and poked around a bit on the Internet. There is a "non-automatic waiver application" to have the IRS consider waiving the 60-day rule via a "private letter ruling:". My question is whether ANYONE has ANY experience with this mechanism such that I can determine either that I shouldn't bother with the process or whether it's worth giving it a try. Very easy to show that I have not profited by the unintended distribution. Not a cheat, just too busy, a dumbass, whatever. Thanks!

> > > > > > > > >
Reply to
wrighttb
Loading thread data ...

In my experience a private letter ruling is available if you convince the IRS that, based on the law, court cases and other IRS rulings, you are entitled to the relief you are asking for. I haven't seen them given for merely equitable reasons. The cost of obtaining a letter ruling is not small. The IRS inposes a fee (as I recall around $2500 the last time I checked). And you should have a tax lawyer submit the request, because the justification should be in the form of a legal brief listing all the relevant law and why it applies. There may be a kind of application for unintentional and hardship cases, but I doubt that a letter ruling is the way to do it. Stu

Reply to
Stuart A. Bronstein

Take a look at the published private letter rulings and see how your circumstances compare. Try Legalbitstream for the PLRs:

formatting link
The actual Code section for the waiver of the 60 day rule is

408(d)(3)(I).
Reply to
Drew Edmundson

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.