Dependent question

With all due respect, your CPA friend doesn't know what she is talking about. I am not a CPA or any other kind of tax expert, but even I can read the plain text rules in the IRS publications.

PUB 17 for example, under

Head of Household (From PUB 17 Page 22 Chapter 2 Filing Status)

Clearly says that to claim HOH you have to have "A ³qualifying person² who has lived with you in the home for more than half the year."

It then explains that a ³qualifying person² can only be either a qualifying child or some other qualifying relative. (See table 2-1 in Pub 17)

It then goes on to describe, in detail, the tests for a qualifying child, which are:

Qualifying Child (Pub 17-Page 26 Chapter 3 Personal Exemptions and Dependents)

There are five tests that must be met for a child to be your qualifying child. The five tests are:

  1. Relationship, 2. Age, 3. Residency, 4. Support, and 5. Special test for qualifying child of more than one person

Relationship Test

To meet this test, a child must be:

? Your son, daughter, stepchild, foster child, or a descendant (for example, your grandchild) of any of them, or

? Your brother, sister, half brother, half sis- ter, stepbrother, stepsister, or a descen- dant (for example, your niece or nephew) of any of them.

There is no need to go on because you are NOT related to your GF's child, so the child CANNOT be YOUR qualifying child.

Take this to you CPA friend and have her look it up before you make a mistake in filing your return (I know first hand that HOH IS one item that raises flags with the IRS).

Reply to
Ernie Klein
Loading thread data ...

I think I see the problem. Up until now you've been saying that GF had about $2,400 in 2007 income. You were just talking about her wages, right? The 1099-C complicates the picture. IF it is gross income to GF she doesn't qualify as your dependent because she fails the gross income test.

As for the fireman's wife/CPA, there are lots of brilliant CPA's who know nothing about taxes. (Her without question wrong advice regarding Head of Household filing status makes me think she's in that category, at least as far as the tax part is concerned.)

But maybe she can be helpful. The 1099-C amount is not automatically gross income to GF. Specifically, it isn't taxable income to her if, at the time the debt was cancelled, she was insolvent. This is a concept that any competent CPA should be able to explain to you.

If it turns out GF doesn't have to include the 1099-C amount in income, your choices are as I stated before. If she does have to include the income, your choices become:

Scenario 1:

GF files Single claiming daughter as qualifying child dependent and for EITC. In addition to the refund of the $148.91 withheld she'd get $859 Earned Income Credit.

You file Single with no dependents.

Scenario 2:

GF files Single without claiming daughter in any way and gets a refund of her $148.91.

You file Single claiming daughter as a qualifying relative dependent.

There's no nice way to put it, she's just flat-out wrong. Walk her through the discussion of the HofH qualifying person in Pub 501 and ask her to show you how someone not related to you by blood, marriage, or official placement as a foster child can be a qualifying person. Hint: the test is different than the test for a dependent.

Daughter's father is irrelevant in all aspects of the discussion since he doesn't pay support and she doesn't live with him.

Reply to
Phil Marti

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.