Taxpayer completed some education and moved into a much higher-paying job in 2013. Still with the same employer, so he didn't fill out a new W-4 or A-4. Previously the taxpayer didn't have a tax liability, and filed only to claim the EIC and withheld tax. Now the taxpayer is disappointed to have a smaller federal refund (without the EIC), and to need much of that to pay Arizona's tax liability.
I can explain the smaller federal refund to the taxpayer -- it's working as designed to cover the tax liability, and he no longer qualifies for a benefit that's rolled into the refund -- but not Arizona. Well, I can explain how the Arizona tax is calculated, but not why withholding didn't adjust smoothly with growing income to cover it. Does Arizona really expect taxpayers to figure what percentage needs to be withheld? Would that percentage not change when the taxpayer's income changes, as the actual income tax is not a single percentage, but based on graduated brackets? Moreover, exemptions and the family credit mean that the slope of the income tax is not zero-based, unlike a straight percentage of wages. How can a fixed withholding percentage possibly remain accurate when the taxpayer's income changes?
Is there a way to figure what percentage needs to be withheld when there has been a major change in a taxpayer's income (or a taxpayer just moved to Arizona), short of prospectively preparing next year's tax return?
Thanks, Lee