Income Basis For Proposed "Tax Rebate"

Has anyone seen or heard of just how IRS is going to determine the income basis that will be used to establish individual eligibility and the amount to be "rebated" based on actual income, children, etc?

To use 2007 income, they would have to wait until April, when the bulk of returns are filed. And then there are those who file for extensions.

2006 income? Not too accurate a basis.

There was speculation today (1/24) that it might be April, May or even June before the rebate checks are cut. The reason given was that IRS is "busy" now with "other things" -- like collecting taxes?. Perhaps this is their cover for waiting until the bulk of 2007 returns are filed. In the meantime, the economy sputters on.

Of course, all of the above depends on the Congress and administration stopping patting themselves on the back long enough to pass a bill and get this moving.

What a mess!

Reply to
William Brenner
Loading thread data ...

We certainly agree on that! As Ollie said to Stan: "That's anOTHER fine mess you got us into."

"they" can't wait until 2007 returns are filed to have a foundation to base any so called "rebates" on. They will have to use 2006 in my opinion.

Now they're talking about maybe in May getting checks out.

Married Joint client today asked about it, when will they get their

1600$. (Of course we know now it's max of 1200$). I had to tell them that most probably they would not be getting anything atall, since they had no tax liability in 2oo6 since income was only pension plus social security.

Oh boy, it's going to be FUN!

ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

"William Brenner" wrote

I read it's $300 per person, children too....not to exceed $1200 per family.

Indeed, and those who file extensions will have to wait longer......

I suspect it'll be based off of the 2006 return data.

I think they are shooting for June, but if you remember back some 7 years ago when they did this before, it took several weeks and a couple of weeks, up to a month and a half to mail out several hundred million checks, so I suspect they'll be sending checks in July as well.

Naa, it's a major task to do something that hasn't been done in 7 years.

Most likely it'll take weeks to develop the program to compute and print checks. Now you're into March at least.

Or even grows.........

What can you do with $300? For some folks, that's their kids monthly texting bill. It was cheaper with walkie talkies or a string and two tin cans.

Reply to
Paul Thomas

Sorry if my first question was not clear. I was referring to how they would qualify rebatees.

According to cnn.com, here is the payout schedule: Keep in mind that this is the House version and is subject to screwing up by the Senate.

"Sources on Capitol Hill and at the Treasury Department said the plan would send checks of $600 to individuals and $1,200 to couples who paid income tax and who filed jointly.

"People who did not pay federal income taxes but who had earned income of more than $3,000 would get checks of $300 per individual or $600 per couple.

"A Democratic aide and Republican aide said there will be an additional amount per child, which could be in the neighborhood of $300.

"Those who earn up to $75,000 individually or up to $150,000 as a couple will be eligible for the payments, said Republican and Democratic sources familiar with the tentative deal."

formatting link

Reply to
William Brenner

"William Brenner" wrote

Yeah, I'm reading that now....mis-reporting in the early war on getting the scoop on the story said $300 per person - $1200 per family.

Reply to
Paul Thomas, CPA

True, but it is still just a proposal. Don't spend my money just yet . . .

Reply to
inky dink

Every news report I've seen refers to "dependents" in the first reference, then changes it to "children" in subsequent references. Is it clear to anyone whether non-child dependents are included?

Cynthia in Chicago

Reply to
C Cheski

does 1040 distinguish between children and dependents? if not, then I would think the give-away would not either.

Reply to
Gil Faver

This is a good point. My guess is that is will end up like the child tax credit -- which applies to children under 17 who are US citizens, residents, or nationals, plus a few other conditions.

Another point that came up in my discussions was how it will be for divorced people. Say P1 and P2 are divorced and have a child C. C lives with P1 who has released the exemption to C2. Then who will get the rebate? I'm guessing that it will be P1.

Reply to
removeps-groups

Without legislation to look at.. who knows. It is complicated because the same child can legitimately be listed on two different tax returns: 1. Custodial parent as a nondependent in order to file HOH and possibly apply for the EITC & C&DCC and 2. Noncustodial parent as the dependent.

Reply to
Alan

Following is a summary of the negotiated stimulus package released by Congressman John Boehner's office. The 2007 tax year is the base period for computing the rebate checks.

================ SUMMARY -- 2008 ECONOMIC GROWTH PACKAGE Office of Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH)

Release Date: JANUARY 24, 2008

OVERVIEW-REFUND CHECKS

All Americans who have earned income of at least $3,000 in 2007 will receive at least a $300 rebate check. Those Americans with children will also receive $300 additional for each child. In general, Americans who have an income tax liability will receive progressively more, up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for couples, plus the additional amount for children. This plan is phased out for single filers with more than $75,000 of Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) and $150,000 for married couples filing jointly.

The rebate is strongly titled towards taxpayers, with more than 70% of its benefits going to individuals and families that pay income taxes.

The proposal is an accelerated reduction of the 10% rate for 2008 filings, which will reduce income taxes for millions of hardworking Americans. Specifically, the rebate includes a one-time payment of 10% of the first $6,000 of taxable income ($12,000 if married filing jointly) for a maximum check of $600 ($1,200 if married filing jointly). In addition, the proposal provides an additional amount for millions of families with kids.

The rebates will be sent to qualifying individuals and families by check, which will be delivered as soon as possible; the amounts will NOT be part of a taxpayer's regular income tax refund.

Under the plan, Americans will need to make no additional filing with the IRS or otherwise apply for the checks; they will be mailed automatically.

GENERAL STRUCTURE: There are two ways Americans can receive a check: 1) If a person pays income taxes; or 2) If a person has earned income of at least $3,000 (i.e., the individual must have worked in 2007). Check amounts will be the sum of two separate calculations: the Base Amount and the Children's Bonus. Checks will be phased-out for those with AGI above $75,000 ($150,000 in the case of married couples filing jointly).

  1. The Base Amount:

The base amount is whichever is greater between two options:

Option A -- Federal income tax paid in 2007, with a maximum of $ 600 for single filers ($ 1,200 for married filing jointly).

OR

Option B -- A flat amount of $300 for single filers ($600 married for married filing jointly), but only if the filer's earned income in 2007 was at least $3,000.

PLUS

The Children's Bonus:

Anyone qualifying for the base amount (because they had at least $3,000 in earned income or paid at least $1 in federal income taxes in 2007) also receives an additional $300 per child, with no cap on the number of children.

Revenue Cost [in billions of dollars]

Total: $103 Outlay increase: $28 Tax reduction: $75

EXAMPLES

Ex 1. John Doe had a job for part of the year, earning $9,000. He has custody of two children. He owed no federal income taxes for 2007. Under the proposal he would be eligible for a Base Amount of $300 for himself (because his earned income was at least $3,000). His earned income would also be sufficient to get a $300 Children's Bonus for each of his two kids, for a total of $900.

Ex. 2. Mr. and Mrs. Smith both worked part-time in 2007 and have two children. After application of available deductions and credits, they had a federal income tax liability of $500 for 2007. Under the proposal, they would be better off with Base Amount of $600 for a couple (for which they qualify, because their earned income was more than $3,000). They would therefore also have enough earned income to qualify for a Children's Bonus of $300 for each of the five children. Thus, their total check would be $

1,200.

Ex. 3. Mr. and Mrs. Jones have five children. After taking available credits and deductions, their 2007 taxable income was $95,000, leaving them with a federal income tax liability of just over $16,600. Under the proposal, they would get the full Base Amount of $ 1,200. They would also qualify for a Children's Bonus of $1,500, bringing their total check to $2,700.

Ex. 4. Mr. and Mrs. Senior are retired. As a result of their investment income, the couple paid $4,000 in federal income taxes in 2007, meaning they would get the full base amount of $1,200. They had no dependent children, so there is no Children's Bonus.

Ex. 5. Mr. and Mrs. Ipo have one child. They were able to retire young but still collect dividends and capital gains from a business they sold a few years ago. The couple paid $19,000 in federal income taxes on that income in 2007. They would therefore qualify for the Base Amount of $1,200. They would also qualify for a Children's Bonus of $300, because they paid at least $1 of federal income tax in 2007 (even though they had no earned income), for a total check of $1,500.

Ex. 6. Mr. and Mrs. Withers are lawyers, with a combined income in 2007 of $

300,000. They have four children. Because their AGI is over $150,000, they are disqualified from receiving either the Base Amount or the Children's Bonus. They would not receive a check.

OVERVIEW-BUSINESS TAX CUTS

Bonus Depreciation: The economic growth package will provide for a 50 percent bonus deduction on new equipment in the year it is placed in service, with certain exceptions for equipment with a "long life." This temporary tax cut offers significant savings on new property with a depreciation period of 20 years or less. This will give employers -- particularly small businesses -- greater incentive to invest and create jobs for more Americans searching for work. The temporary bonus depreciation, coupled with expensing measures enacted in May 2003, resulted in a four percent increase in business spending in the first six months alone. The cost is approximately $42.3B for 2008.

Section 179 Expensing: This provision allows employers, including small businesses, to fully expense $250,000 in both new and used tangible property in the year it is purchased up to an overall investment limit of $800,000. This will provide a particularly strong incentive for small companies to invest in their businesses so they can continue to provide good-paying jobs for the American people. The cost is approximately $1B for 2008.

Increase in Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE)/Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Conforming Loan Limit: The conforming loan limits for both FHA and GSE (such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) loans would be increased from $362,000 to $725,000 and from $417,000 to $625,000 respectively.

================= Condor

Reply to
Condor

...And the Senate discussion of the bill wants to include retirees. They might not be getting zero.

However, no one gets anything until the thing gets signed into law. Until then, why worry?

Reply to
D. Stussy

Not a question of "worrying" about it. Those of us in the business face these questions from our clients and that's why we have to stay abreast of what's happening.

ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.