IRS Invites Public Comments on Items That Should Be Included in 2009-2010 Guidance Priority List

The Treasury Department and IRS on Friday issued an advance copy of Notice 2009-43, 2009-21 I.R.B. ___ (May 26, 2009), inviting public comment on recommendations for items that should be included on the

2009-10 Guidance Priority List:

The Treasury Department's Office of Tax Policy and the Service use the Guidance Priority List each year to identify and prioritize the tax issues that should be addressed through regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices, and other published administrative guidance. The 2009-2010 Guidance Priority List will establish the guidance that the Treasury Department and the Service intend to issue from July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2010. The Treasury Department and the Service recognize the importance of public input to formulate a Guidance Priority List that focuses resources on guidance items that are most important to taxpayers and tax administration. Published guidance plays an important role in increasing voluntary compliance by helping to clarify ambiguous areas of the tax law. ...

In reviewing recommendations and selecting projects for inclusion on the 2009- 2010 Guidance Priority List, the Treasury Department and the Service will consider the following:

Whether the recommended guidance resolves significant issues relevant to many taxpayers; Whether the recommended guidance promotes sound tax administration; Whether the recommended guidance can be drafted in a manner that will enable taxpayers to easily understand and apply the guidance; Whether the Service can administer the recommended guidance on a uniform basis; and Whether the recommended guidance reduces controversy and lessens the burden on taxpayers or the Service. Recommendations must be submitted by May 31, 2009 for possible inclusion on the original 2009-2010 Guidance Priority List.

Here is the link for the full notice.

formatting link
1687,00.html I suggested to Henry Schneiderman of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel that the comments received be made available over the internet. All in the interest of transparency.

Cheers,

WDK

Reply to
KEBSCHULLW
Loading thread data ...

Anyone who offers comments directly to the Office of Chief Counsel also has the option of publicizing those comments for themselves if they so desire. They don't need Hank to do it for them.

Reply to
Bill Brown

Prof. Brown:

I actually thought it would be interesting to compare the list of issues for which comments were received with the issues that actually make it onto the Guidance Priority List. All in the interest of tranparency, you understand.

Cheers,

WDK

Reply to
KEBSCHULLW

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.