Lazy direct seller: Other Income or Schedule C?

Taxpayer attended a meeting of a multi-level marketing association (MLM) and was persuaded to sign up. She only bought some of the MLM materials for her own use, and never at any time tried to recruit other members into the MLM. She was eventually paid a total of less than $100, a portion of the purchases made by people who joined the MLM after she did, but were recruited by the same person who recruited her rather than by herself.

On the one hand, the taxpayer's behavior seems to perfectly fit the definition of a hobby. She did not sign up with the MLM for income or profit and was not involved with "continuity and regularity". The taxpayer has not even kept the receipts for materials purchased from the MLM. Therefore it makes sense to me to report the

Reply to
Lee Choquette
Loading thread data ...

I agree that the income should go on line 21. She does not meet the definition of "direct seller" in Pub. 15-A because she is not "engaged in selling." Purchases for her own use are not business expenses.

Bob Sandler

Reply to
Bob Sandler

I must lead a very unadventurous life, because I occassionally see a pink SUV with Mary Kay written on it, but I've never had a MLM client with a schedule C profit.

Given your fact pattern I would vote hobby business, but would not be surprised if the client walks away.

Reply to
Arthur Kamlet

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.