A couple of questions and a couple of posts.
Taxpayer sells personal residence in about 2004 or so, Married Filing Joint, and uses about 200K of the 500K exclusion. There was a suit pending related to contamination on the site.
3 years later, in 2007 he receives about $100K legal settlement on the contamination suit.The lawyers take 1/3.
Understandably, his position is: (1) This settlement is linked to the sale of the residence, and that liability really existed at that time and so should not be taxable. (2) The legal fees are to get what was originally rightfully his, he was only "made whole" by the settlement, so legal expenses should be 2% misc deductible as protection of assets.
What say you?