Medical deduction for drugs? supplements?

I know that drugs prescribed by a doctor are deductible. But there are many Supplements that doctors will often advise a patient to take for a specific condition that do not require a prescription to obtain.

Why should a medication that requires a prescription to obtain be 'more deductible' than a medication that is available over the counter?

Thats a bit of a rhetorical question, but making it more specific, can a case be made in support of deducting the annual cost of a specific medication that is advised for a patient to take on an ongoing basis, by a doctor, for a specific condition, that is available over the counter ?

Reply to
boostm3
Loading thread data ...

No. The law requires that the substance can't be obtained OTC.

Reply to
Phil Marti

OTC can be paid for through Health Savings Accounts and the accounts where you put a little money away with your employer and it is forfeited at the end of the year and whose name currently escapes me. I know this isn't what the OP asked, but it might be an option to consider this year or next.

Reply to
Kurt Ullman

The name is "FSA - Flexible Spending Account".

It is rather strange that you can pay for OTC drgs with FSA, but can't deduct them on Schedule A. The FSA form might ask for a letter from your doctor stating that you need this OTC medicine, though I'm not sure if this is required by law.

Reply to
removeps-groups

Can't say for sure with the FSA (thanks for the reminder), but my HSA manual says OTC can be reimbursed, period. Maybe I should use that ability to buy some Ginko for my memory (g).

Reply to
Kurt Ullman

Not a bad idea, but REMEMBER....! you then have to remember to take the pills!

(now where did I put my memory pills?)

ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

It makes no sense that OTC drugs cannot be deducted on schedule A. Aren't you supposed to exclude any FSA reimbursements from schedule A medical deductions? If those include OTC drugs it would not be fair to have to subtract an amount including OTC drugs from a number that does not include them.

========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: No one ever suggested that the tax code was either fair or made any sense.

Reply to
Mike20878

Write your members of Congress and tell them. They love to hear from constituents, especially in election years.

Reply to
Phil Marti

Amedicaldeductions? If those include OTC drugs it would not be fair

Yes, you do have to include reimbursements. So if your doctor's visits were $600, and FSA paid $500, you could only report $100 on Schedule A before the 7.5%. If OTC drugs were deductible, the same rule would apply.

If you write to your congress person as Phil suggests, you can also suggest lowering the threshold from 7.5% to 5%, and making (part of) medical expenses not added back to AMT :).

Reply to
removeps-groups

Why not eliminate the deductable altogether. After all we are talking about the sick and wounded. while we are at it why not get rid of AMT altogether.

Reply to
Haskel LaPort

altogether.

Because the AMT is (almost) the flat tax you dreamed of. ;-)

Reply to
D. Stussy

And here, all along, I thought that the flat tax that everyone dreams of is the revenue-neutral tax that lowers everybody's tax bill! ;-D

Reply to
Tom Russ

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.