I know that drugs prescribed by a doctor are deductible. But there are many Supplements that doctors will often advise a patient to take for a specific condition that do not require a prescription to obtain.
Why should a medication that requires a prescription to obtain be 'more deductible' than a medication that is available over the counter?
Thats a bit of a rhetorical question, but making it more specific, can a case be made in support of deducting the annual cost of a specific medication that is advised for a patient to take on an ongoing basis, by a doctor, for a specific condition, that is available over the counter ?