Do you really want all the people who feel the ethical situation to leave, and you?re left with people who think it?s just fine or who don?t even see it? In working in four different ?Storefront? offices, only one fellow co-worker saw and felt the issue of the loans and cross-collection like I did. That?s disappointing. The other people are good people, sincere people, wanting to help their client, so what happens? In my judgment, most people tend to discount something that is merely written. We can start with health and safety warnings which are sometimes overblown and poorly thought out, so it?s self- protection and rational to some extent. Most people, unless they hear something relatively first-hand, will discount.
Prior to my first year, I read a consumer website, ?Yeah, I owed them money, but that was between me and them, I don?t know how Household got in the middle of it.? I have not been able to re-find that. That would help. These kind of warnings from real people. I would seriously entertain the idea of printing them out and showing them to clients. And we could kind of combine these with more formal publications. Most people still have their mind on getting the loan, so this is still something from left field. And besides, this is communicating in paragraphs which, as a nerd, I tend to do. This isn?t ping-ponging back and forth in a good dialogue.
This season I did okay. The office manager seemed like a good guy, and I felt I could talk with him. I showed him the part of the RAL application that stated, ?REPAYING DEBT . . . OTHER RAL LENDERS.? Now, I was a little bit disappointed that he didn?t tell people. But he didn?t stand in my way when I told people and it was not a surprise to him. I was proactive, confident, matter-of-fact, and it kind of worked out.
I eventually hit upon the method of simply underlining those parts in blue ink in front of the client. And since we ask people to sign about seven or eight pieces of papers, it?s good communication to draw their attention to the most important parts.
Now, with the H&R Block ?Emerald Card,? which is kind of a debit card, you can do it with the 8 ?15 day (on average) non-loan product. But it?s still a bank product, and it?s still vulnerable to cross- collection.
I do generally agree on the subject of people who are ?unbanked.? My first year at ?Storefront,? I remember being astonished at how many people did not have any kind of bank account at all. However, the first thing I?d want to look at is whether banks make it difficult for low-income persons to have accounts (they do in some ways, it?s just a question of how much).
Okay, what would really help me do a better job would be a list of who HSBC cross-collects for. I have found a list for Bank One for tax season 2006, from their four-page loan application put on line by a tax, management, and real estate firm.
formatting link
Beneficial, Household, Santa Barbara Bank and Trust??as well asseven additional banks!?plus their ?successors or assigns.? Now, infairness, they do state, ?Refund Anticipation Loan from any prioryear.? That?s a little different than the 2008 HSBC application?OTHER RAL LENDERS,? which does not specify the type of debt. Andthis is where I become cynical of institutions, and I think properlyso. Debt collection is a profitable business, they?re likely to pushthe envelope as far as they can, with all kind of high-sounding moralreasons.
There?s also an instruction book from Bank One for the ?06 season which lists the same eleven banks (page 44).
formatting link
So yeah, I like the interaction with clients, I think I make a difference. I?m open to working tax season next year (pending what all else is going on in my life, of course!), and I?d like to do even a better job of it. Any help you can provide would be appreciated. I think of you folks as my more experienced colleagues, even though we don?t always do the same things. And I hope I can sometimes contribute, too.
-Tiger