Is the reason good enough? That one of the two partners is funding the venture which is not profitable yet so he gets to accept all the loses. Steve
Is the reason good enough? That one of the two partners is funding the venture which is not profitable yet so he gets to accept all the loses. Steve
This brings up a good question. From what you say, only one of the two members put in money. The question for debate here now becomes, can a person be a member of an LLC without having invested any funds atall? Might the answer depend on state law? Do all states have same laws on the subject? Is there a Uniform LLC Act? ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA
LLC law is pretty consistent from state to state.
As I understand it, the contributions to the LLC can be anything that the members agree to. For example, one partner might put in all the money, the other does all the work, and they agree to be 50/50 owners. Having done that, you'd still need a valid reason to divide losses other than by the ownership shares. No, I don't know what the IRS considers to be a valid reason, either. Regards, John Levine, snipped-for-privacy@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be,
BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.