Section 179 help for 2003 return

Apr 12, 2007 10 Replies

I'm filing 2003 taxes and have a refund coming (long story, I have had several major surgeries and rehab from 2002 to



2006, but an incompetent CPA has left me in this spot).


2001 taxes were filed w/ $6050 refund applied toward future taxes. 2002 taxes are not done yet, but I was eligible for a refund of approx $ 7-9K - had I not missed the 3 year deadline.



I have a small computer consulting business and had W2 income as well from 1998 to 2003.



I'm confused about the section 179 deduction and the special depreciation allowance. I bought a qualifying truck 12-31-2002 (over 6,000 lbs). I am going to take the sec 179 deduction in 2003, the year the truck was put into service. I've read several articles and IRS pub 463,



946, and 3991 - a May 2002 supplement.

I read SOMEWHERE (or dreamed it) that you had to put the vehicle in service, and take the 179 deduction, and purchase the vehicle all in the same tax year. I haven't been able to find that statement again, so I'm hoping some of you will be able to clarify that for me.



Unfortunately, since I've fired my CPA that lost my 2002 refund, I'm struggling to complete the small business portion of my tax return. I don't have a copy of any tax software for 2003, so I'm using TurboTax 2004 to give me a little help on filling out these schedules.



Thanks for any help.



Cathy



>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

The Section 179 election is not valid for a late filed return.

Oh, boy. That is not the answer I wanted to hear, but thanks for your response. Not to argue with someone who is more knowledgeable, but can you tell me what pub (and the section/area of the pub) gives a statement to that effect? When I reviewed instructions today the only thing I found pertained to the Special Depreciation Allowance. It stated that the special depreciation allowance had to be taken on a timely filed return. So I bet you're going to tell me that neither can be deductions on a late return... What a large gift I've given to the IRS, 2 years running.

Ck

That used to be the case, but I think it changed somewhere along the line. or maybe IRS didn't notice when I filed a late return once for a client with section 179 property. ChEAr$$$$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

The regulations make it clear that a valid section 179 election *can* be made on a late-filed return. Here's what the regs say: "The election under section 179 and 1.179-1 to claim a section 179 expense deduction for section 179 property shall be made on the taxpayer's first income tax return for the taxable year to which the election applies (whether or not the return is timely) or on an amended return filed within the time prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing the return for such taxable year."

Actually it looks like Mike's not correct. Treasury Regulation 1.179-5 says, "The election under section 179 and 26 C.F.R. § 1.179-1 to claim a section 179 expense deduction for section 179 property shall be made on the taxpayer's first income tax return for the taxable year to which the election applies (whether or not the return is timely) or on an amended return filed within the time prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing the return for such taxable year." Note the operative terms: the election "shall be made on the taxpayer's first income tax return for the taxable year ... (whether or not the return is timely)...." There is no restriction in section 179 that requires the election to be taken on a return that is filed timely. Stu

You are correct. It did get changed. Thanks.

Hey Harlan, That's an interesting response. I wish Mike would respond to my reply to his msg. I asked him to point out the Pub # and tell me where the statement is that says it's disallowed on a late return. Was that fairly recently that you used a 179 deduction? And did you also take the Special Depreciation Allowance? (or was it around then) Clock's a ticking' and I'm leaning towards taking the 179 and if they refuse it, maybe they can show me where to find that rule. Thanks for your input. Please share any other related info. Cathy

Well, I was just trying to be polite in my response. But more to the point, see Stuart's reply above.

Can't remember when, but probably several years ago. And I'd do it again.

Just do it.

ChEAr$$$$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

I have a client who regularly files a year or more late, usually when Franchise Tax Board threatens to garnish his wife's wages. He had taken to filing their return with mortgage interest and property tax and charitable contributions only, omitting his Sch. C . We tried to claim

179 on some items he put into service on the amended return to claim Sch. C income and deductions. It was denied and he was forced to depreciate the items . On those returns where he filed late (beyond the extension due date) with a 179 deduction, it was allowed. Linda Dorfmont E.A., CFP, CSA
[Ck breathes 5 or 6 sighs of relief....]

Thanks so much to ALL of you for your replies - and the referenced quotes as well. I know it took some time to find that specific regulation, section and paragraph.

I had about decided to take the 179 and just hope it was allowed. It's a pretty significant deduction and I need all the help I can get this year.

I have a related question I'll throw in here, but will probably need to post a new topic to get a response.

Is timely filing required to be eligible for the Special Depreciation Allowance? I understand that it is supposed to be taken in the first year that the item is put in service. But what if your return is late?

This is similar to the 179 deduction; it's difficult to find all-inclusive concrete rules in one publication. I've read so much about both subjects that they have blended into a large gray mass.

Thanks again,

Cathy

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required