A client was offered two job contracts for the same company. The first contract is as a consultant, as an employee, for a specific salary.
The second contract is as a real estate broker, an officer of the employing corporationa, but as an independent contractor.
As I read the law, that would be proper - even though under all other circumstances a real estate broker would be considered an employee, if she fits the three part test in ?3508 (which she does) she can be considered a contractor for federal tax purposes.
Now the employer (which offered this dichotomy in the first place) is having second thoughts about whether the contractor scheme is proper.
Am I missing something?
Thanks.