[big snip]
| > Ok, I may just be a bit slow today, but I don't see how you get | > that interpretation from the DMV text you posted. Where does it | > make a distinction between temporary and non-temporary jobs? | | The website just contains the bare necessities.
Plus apparently some stuff that isn't even necessary. :)
| One has to look | to Division 6 Chapter 1 of the CA Motor Vehicle Code. Feel free | to browse the code. It's at
formatting link
On (admittedly cursory) reading I can't figure out where the job- related driver's license requirement comes from at all (unless it has something to do with a job that is itself driving and then it sounds like you need the license first anyway).
However, were I the original poster's son and if the FTB asked me why I got a California driver's license I would quote the DMV's summary and explain that I interpreted it in the obvious way. I needed to support myself while I was in California temporarily visiting with my family before heading overseas and it sure sounded like I was required to have a California driver's license to comply with the law.
[I would probably resist the temptation to be snarky and ask if the FTB would be making the same kind of argument if the situation were reversed. That is, if I had been a long-time resident of California and switched my driver's license to Texas for six months before heading overseas I'll bet the FTB would not be claiming that I had changed my domicile to Texas. :]
| > What if your California job is decidedly non-temporary but you | > live in (commute from) an adjacent state. Do you need a California | > driver's license? | > | Like if you live on the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe and work on the | Ca side?
Yes, like that. However, since I see nothing in the actual regulations to support the DMV's statement the question is pretty much moot.
Dan Lanciani ddl@danlan.*com