MA has the following scheme to help bribe elderly folks into supporting real estate tax increases (yes, I'm a cynic):
If you are over 65 and your total income (i.e. including stuff MA doesn't tax) is less than $55,000 (if filing single, I forget the cutoff for MFJ), and you house is assessed at under approx $700,000, then you get a refundable state income tax credit to the extent that the real estate tax you paid on your residence exceeds 10% of your total income, but not to exceed $1030 (for 2013).
If you're a renter, you get a refundable credit to the extent that 25% of your rent exceeds 10% of your total income (subject to the same $1030 cap).
I would assume that if the taxpayer doesn't itemize federally then this is clearly non-taxable.
But if they do itemize, what happens?
First, for those who are homeowners, does the taxability analysis treat it as a refund/recovery of state income tax or as a refund/recovery of real estate tax paid? (Presumably for renters it would have to be analyzed as a refund/recovery of state income tax.)
Assuming it is analyzed as a state income tax refund, what happens?
Let's say in 2012 the taxpayer had withheld $5000 in state income tax and deducted that $5000 on their 2012 federal return. They also received the full $1030 credit. (In all these cases pretend the sales tax deduction is zero (even though it wouldn't be) and assume taxable income is high enough that the taxpayer got the full benefit of the deduction.)
1) Tax liability before the taking the credit into account was $4000, so they had a pre-credit overpay of $1000 and so end up getting a $2030 refund.2) Tax liability before taking the credit into account was $5500, so they had a pre-credit balance due of $500 and so end up getting a $530 refund.
3) Tax liability before taking the credit into account was $6030, so they had a pre-credit balance due of $1030 and get zero refund.In (1) is the taxable amount of the refund on the 2013 federal return $1000 or $2030?
In (2) is the taxable amount of the refund $0 or $530?
In (3) it'd be a zero taxable amount because no refund was received. However...
Are refundable state income tax credits considered (by the federal rules) to be reductions in state income tax or payments of state income tax? (By analogy, on the federal form the federal EIC is listed in the payments section of Form 1040. Though is that because it is a credit that really, legally, treated as a tax payment made by the taxpayer or is the EIC placed in the payments section simply it makes the form "flow" better?)