What happens to deferred vacation losses on home no longer a vacation home?

Relative has a second home that has historically had 14+ days of personal use (lived in during summer, rented out to unrelated parties the rest of the year).

Over time, the property has built up quite a bit of "deferred" losses due to the vacation home loss limitation rule.

With advancing age, the relative will no longer be living in the house during the summer and the personal use days will drop to zero.

So what happens next? I assume that since the vacation home loss limit is no longer in place the property will now be allowed to generate a loss based on current-year income and current-year expenses.

But what about the pent-up loss? Can any of it come on to the current return? Or can it only be used to reduce a current-year profit down to zero but not to create or increase a current-year loss?

Reply to
Rich Carreiro
Loading thread data ...

I thought the "personal use" rule caused (most) "losses" to be lost, rather than suspended. Am I missing something?

-- Arthur L. Rubin, CRTP, AFSP, Brea, CA

Reply to
Arthur Rubin

Yes. Disallowed operating expenses and disallowed casualty and theft losses and depreciation are carried over. You can see this in the worksheet that is in IRS Pub 527 on Rental Property.

Reply to
Alan

The disallowed expenses from prior years are still business expenses, not personal expenses. As such, they get added to current year expenses and may create a loss in the current year.

Reply to
Alan

My understanding is that such carryover losses remain forever subject to the 280A limitations. So in accordance with that, they generally CANNOT create a loss in the current year. And in the eventual year of sale, any remaining 280A carryovers can probably be applied to the extent of gain on sale, but again cannot create a loss.

Note that the handling of 280A carryovers is significantly different than the handling of passive losses. And life can get difficult if you have to apply both sels of rules to a particular property.

Reply to
MTW

In the specific case the accumulated disallowed losses are on the order of $15K (the property has been held for ~30 years and while the average loss has been low, it's added up over all those years). That whole $15K can come onto the current year return and create a big current loss? (For my relative this would have the added "fun" of likely creating a NOL since relative's other income is pretty low.)

In this case the relative is essentially abandoning the personal use due to age so lack of personal use will NOT be a one-time thing. But your answer would appear to indicate that a taxpayer in this situation could simply forego any personal use in a single year and be able to free up and take all those expenses in that one year, and then in the following years go back to the normal personal use pattern. Seems too good to be true!

Reply to
Rich Carreiro

Looks like Mike is right. Oh well. From IRC 280A(c)(5):

Any amount not allowable as a deduction under this chapter by reason of the preceding sentence shall be taken into account as a deduction (allocable to such use) under this chapter for the succeeding taxable year. Any amount taken into account for any taxable year under the preceding sentence shall be subject to the limitation of the 1st sentence of this paragraph whether or not the dwelling unit is used as a residence during such taxable year.

Reply to
Rich Carreiro

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.