Who says Tax Court can't be interesting?

A gift vs. income case with, say, unusual facts :-)

>
formatting link
Also
formatting link

This is interesting and humorous. Payment from a doctor to his paramour's husband is income to the husband.

On what grounds was the husband going to sue? Reads more like extortion to me. How gullible could this guy be to believe a doctor didn't have the $150,000 he was going to sue him for?

> > > > > > >
Reply to
Dick Adams
Loading thread data ...

In some states I imagine you can still sue for alienation of affection.

It could well be that, too. On the other hand the doc was reported to the medical board in spite of the payment. So it's unlikely there was a threat to report him unless payment was made.

If the guy was so busy seducing his patients, maybe he didn't have enough time to earn big bucks. Stu

Reply to
Stuart A. Bronstein

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.