Advice please. Can this financial advisor do more to help a friend?

I've been listening to a real-life dispute about professional responsibilities which was inconclusive. I would like some info about it.

Essentially, would a financial advisor get into professional trouble if he executed a friend's will "flexibly" (in other words, bending the rules a bit but not a lot)? The will is unconnected with any works he does.

Here's the actual situation:

The financial advisor works for a small to medium firm of advisors. He's been qualified as an APFC for some time. His work consists mainly of giving presentations to staff in larger companies who are due to retire and whom he may subsequently advise on a one to one basis. Some clients seem to anticipate something approaching £1 million pounds to invest.

He has a (female) friend and this friend's her father has named the advisor as executor of his will. The father has no other children.

A problem may arise when the girl's father dies. The advisor is saying he is bound to be absolutely 100% rigid in applying any rules when executing the will. The daughter doesn't know what her father's will contains but would like to think that, acting as a friend, the advisor may exercise some discretion in her favour.

The advisor feels he may get into professional trouble if he showed such "flexibility" or rule bending. The daughter no feels he is being potentially obstructive because many wills are handled in practical way rather than absolutely to the letter of the regulations. She can't see why he would need to be entirely inflexible. At this stage no one know exactly what "flexible" will actually mean but one can make a rough guess. Perhaps dates of gifts made before death will be ill-defined or ... who knows what.

The question is does the advisor genuinely risk professional trouble for a matter which is not being done as part of his work?

Arguably SETTLING wills is not really part of his work at all although he might ADVISE how to arrange a client's affairs to the best advantage for a will. So he couldn't pretend he didn't know the rules

Would any professional trouble he got into for this actually affect his career. Could he just get told to cool it and mind his step in future.

Reply to
joanne
Loading thread data ...

It sounds like a can of worms. Executors have to deal with the will in accordance with the law and an IFA should be well aware of the consequences of acting fraudulently in the way the woman thinks he should do as executor. Their responsibility is to the estate and they are not allowed to show bias in favour of any beneficiary. The woman needs to be told that the executor has to deal with the will strictly according to the law and that there is no room for "flexibility" in this context. Just because she thinks that wills are often dealt with illegally is no excuse.

Peter Crosland

Reply to
Peter Crosland

If your question is "Can something an adviser does *outside* of work affect his position *in* work", then the answer is definitely yes. Presumably he's authorised by the FSA, in which case he has to satisfy the 'fit and proper' test. If he was found to have, say,dishonestly provided incorrect dates for gifts with the intention of defrauding HMRC of inheritance tax, that might well result in him losing his authorisation and thus being fired.

It seems strange to me that this is a problem now. Does the daughter feel that there is a particular 'rule' that she wants him to bend?

Reply to
Mouse

In what way does she think he might be willing to bend the rules? You've made an example of falsifying the dates on which gifts were made. If quoting the wrong date purposely results in less IHT being paid then that is tax evasion and carries penalties. One might ask, who would know, if no record of the gift was made? But this might be challenged by the Revenue. It's fraught with problems and if the IFA ends up in clink then, yes, it will affect his career. Can the daughter give an example of an executor actually having been flexible, or is she just guessing?

Rob Graham

Reply to
robgraham

There are two distinct issues here. First, there's the administration of the

*estate* - which is gathering in all the assets, applying for probate, and settling any IHT and other relevant tax bills. If *anyone* doing this is caught acting illegally - such as making false declarations in order to avoid IHT - it is taken very seriously, and the person may incur severe penalties. This won't do the career of a Financial Advisor any good!

Then there's the administration of the *Will* - which involves distributing the net assets in the way laid down by the deceased. On completion of the probate process, the Will will be placed in the public domain - so all beneficiaries can see what they are entitled to. If the Executor exercises 'flexibility' in favour of one beneficiary at the expense of the others, it may not be illegal per se - but it could certainly be challenged in the civil courts. However, if *all* the beneficiaries agree, there's no reason why the estate can't be divided in a different way from that laid down in the Will. This would best be handled by drawing up a Deed of Variation. Care needs to be taken because this *could* affect IHT liability if, for example, an asset which was to have passed to a spouse tax-free passes to someone else instead.

Reply to
Roger Mills

Everyone here is assuming fraudulent intent, but it is possible to change a will quite legally, as long as all the affected beneficiaries agree.

Reply to
David Woolley

It is? In what way would people go about doing this - I certainly dont want my will being changed whatsoever, especially with regard to trusts for my minor nephews.

Reply to
Chris Street

Roger Mills has already given the answer to that. I believe the trust would be a beneficiary, so would have to agree to such a change. However you should consult a lawyer if you want to be sure that your will is watertight. IANAL.

Reply to
David Woolley

If the executor does not treat distribute the estate according to law that is also serious since it is a breach of trust for which he could incur criminal penalties. There is no question about a Deed of Variation being the "best" way to deal with some agreed changes it is the only way. However, the tone of the OP strongly suggests that the daughter was expecting some kind of underhand behaviour by the executor.

Peter Crosland

Reply to
Peter Crosland

You're out of luck then. If *all" of the recipients agree to the change there is nothing that you can do to stop them changing it.

tim

Reply to
tim.....

The beneficiaries can, if they all agree, arrange a Deed of Family Arrangement in which they can change who gets what. This can be a big help in mitigating inheritance tax, for example.

Rob Graham

Reply to
robgraham

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.