Giving money to grandchildren - almost

Hi,

The situation is a couple in their 90s. One is highly unlikely to live another 5 years. The other should - but that depends on how they cope with the loss of the other.

They have 5 grand children - all of whom they want to get equal shares of their assets when they both die.

What they want to do is put money aside for their future great grand children, none yet conceived.. - even though they may not be alive when they are born.

So they want to put 5000GBP a year into a "set aside" fund. The great grandchildren (or their parents on their behalf) get 500GBP on birth from the fund (or the remaining balance, if

Reply to
Palindrome
Loading thread data ...

It's really quite a small amount overall, and the administration that would be involved in looking after the money and its eventual distribution vastly exceeds the benefit. In my view, they should be persuaded out of it to avoid the creation of an unnecessary and complicated burden.

Reply to
Norman Wells

Good sensible advice. However, the alternative that they have in mind is to give *me* the money each year with the wish that I simply hand out the dosh as and when any sprogs arrive, etc.

Which I will do - although it possibly isn't the most tax-efficient way of doing it. I can add something in my own will so that whatever is in the fund if I prematurely pop my own clogs is immediately split between their children. Not that I am planning any sudden trips in a kayak in the North Sea.

The fund being simply some form of savings account in my name only used for that purpose.

I was trying to find the best way of doing this. It is possible that one or both of them could end up in a nursing home.. At which point, IIUC, "it gets complicated" if they have been handing out gifts of 5k a year to a family friend in the preceeding years. IIUC, it can also get complicated wrt death duties, if they both having made such gifts in the immediate past years.

Reply to
Palindrome

The most tax efficient and hassle free way of giving money if they are below the inheritance tax threshhold is to leave it to you in their Wills. If they do that, the money is yours to do with as you please, and you can give out whatever gifts to the grandchildren/great grandchildren that you deem appropriate, in accordance with their wishes or not. Even if you intend to follow their wishes to the letter, this has the advantage that you don't need to maintain any separate account, and there is no legal comeback if you fail to make any specific payment.

So, persuade them to do that rather than set up what is in effect a trust that someone has to administer and think about perhaps for years on end after they've gone.

Reply to
Norman Wells

My thoughts too but they also want me to be an executor of their wills..

If they do that, the money is yours to do with as you please,

I don't think that they intend to put any legal constraints on the 5k each year that they are planning to give me, should I not come up with an alternative way of doing what they want. They are more than happy to simply trust me.

It isn't going to be that many years, certainly

Reply to
Palindrome

Sorry, I overlooked the fact that they want to give £5K every year rather than just a single lump sum of that amount when they die. However, you can certainly be a beneficiary as well as an executor of a Will (in fact most executors are beneficiaries too), so that is not a problem. What you can't be is a witness if you are a beneficiary.

Each one can, I think, give a single gift of up to £3000 in any one financial year to whoever they choose, with no tax to pay. In addition to that, they can each give any number of gifts up to, I think, £250 a year, to any number of different people with no tax to pay. Therefore, what they want could quite possibly be achieved perfectly above board by combining their allowances. But what you need is proper financial advice, which I'm not qualified to give. In the meantime, you could of course google for the tax treatment of gifts on the Inland Revenue site.

Reply to
Norman Wells

In message , Norman Wells writes

This may help with clarifying that as it is spelt out quite clearly and remember that you can carry forward the annual exemption one year so that first time round they could give double to get things started

formatting link

Reply to
Paul Harris

In addition, you can give unlimited gifts out of income, as long as your standard of living is not affected by the gifts.

One solution might be for them to establish designated accounts with one or more Investment Trusts, and make regular monthly subscriptions to such accounts. What this would be is a bare trust form an as-yet-unborn child.

Reply to
Terry Harper

Hi Sue

Here's an answer I gave to a similar question with some helpful links (probably more in the rest of the thread) -

formatting link
I'd write a specification and get a quote for initial & reoccuring fees from a STEP solicitor.

formatting link
says that a beneficiary must be named so that appears to rule out running it for unborn children.

These may be worth a look -

formatting link
formatting link
John Boyle is the expert on these matters so it will be interesting to see if he pops up.

btw biological grandchildren only ? Perhaps another thing for them to think about. It's got to be done properly otherwise it'll be an endless source of argument/bad feeling !

hth

Daytona

Reply to
Daytona

Thanks Daytona, Terry,, Paul and Norman.

Reply to
Palindrome

they can also avoid (inheritence) tax by making "regular gifts out of income". For example, if they want to give 5000 per year year then they should set it up as a monthly standing order of 5000/12 pounds so that it becomes a clear pattern of the regular expenditure. there is no limit to the amount of this type of (IHT exempt) gift but the executors will need to be able to demonstrate that it was being paid from income, not, for example, by selling capital bit by bit.

Robert

Reply to
RobertL

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.