Is a GP a "regulated professional person"?

For the purposes of professionally certifying a proof of ID, I mean.

All the wording I can find states something like "...lawyer, banker, accountant, police officer or other regulated professional person...". You certainly used to be able to use a GP for certifying photos for passport applications, for example - is it different in the latest anti-money-laundering regs? Seems odd that it's not specified to the n'th degree what constitutes a "regulated professional person", as is done with the lists of approved forms of proof of address.

Thanks David

Reply to
Lobster
Loading thread data ...

A GP is definitely a "regulated professional person" which means a person in a professional occupation which is regulated by a professional body or a statutory body. Therefore, Registered Medical Practitioners, solicitors, barristers, Members of recognised accontancy bodies, teachers, nurses. Greyer areas might be bank officials, clergymen. Would a grade 1 newbie bank cashier qualify? What about a minister of the Church of the Power and Might (a made up religious group)?

Reply to
Alasdair Baxter

"Established Civil Servants" also used to be on the list for passport photos. I've known photos to be validated by "clergy" from tiny non-denominational churches. I think that there were occasional checks to see if the person worked there or the organisation existed.

Reply to
rob.

In message , Alasdair Baxter writes

Are teachers regulated in a sufficiently 'regulatory' regime? There is no 'Professional Body' as such.

These are regulated, both by the FSA (but not as individuals) and there is a professional body - Chartered Institute of Bankers.

They never used to be and I hope not now! It used to be the case that a bank 'officer' could sign and that meant an employee of the bank who was a formal 'authorised signatory' for the bank which was usually 3 or 4 senior people for a local branch.

Reply to
john boyle

Yes there is for teachers in maintained schools - General Teaching Council (GTC).

Reply to
Alec

I was not impressed recently when Alliance & Leicester wouldn't accept a Chartered Engineer for ID. I wrote to them to point out that I have had at least half a dozen passports done by engineers, and to ask if a GP would do instead, but I didn't get a reply. Needless to say the business (a hefty deposit account) went elsewhere!

Reply to
Newshound

In message , Newshound writes

Thats because Money Laundering guide lines dont accept a Chartered Engineer.

Thats because The Passports Agency are asking for a different thing when they ask for a signature form a professional person and have their own rules which includes knowing you for a number of years. There is no comparison between money Laundering Rules and Passport Agency rules. They set out to do different things.

Never mind.

Reply to
john boyle

In message , Alasdair Baxter writes

Its _possible_ they may want an FSA regulated person for money laundering purposes.

Reply to
news

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.