Looking for some thoughts on my asset allocations

I second Joetaxpayer- there appears to be LOTS of overlap. I would eliminate overlap

I would backup and re-read this thread. Start with the 401k and IRA (non taxable transactions). Come up with an allocation model.

The 50% large cap, 35% mid cap and 15% small cap equity allocation you have is good (from other threads), fewer funds would be my recomendation. International was not discussed in those threads, so maybe 35% Large cap, 20 % mid cap, 10% small cap 25% international large cap and 10% international small cap might be more appropriate for discussion purposes.

For large cap, consider putting 50% overall into FSMKX, Fidelity Value, or some type of equity income fund.

For Mid cap, consider putting 35% overall into FSTMX, Alger Mid Cap Growth or another Mid Cap fund or two. If you want sector funds, divide the 35% into the sector funds you like.

For small cap, look at FSCOX, FID SM CAP INDEPEND or something else.

For international, consider one broad fund (like FSIIX or FID DIVERSIFIED INTL).

Anything you sell in your taxable account will be a taxable event, so maybe some research into which funds are tax efficient prior to undertaking this would save you some money. Not sure what direction you are trying to go... but handling 33 funds is not easy.

Reply to
jIM
Loading thread data ...

I agree jIM that international is probably an important sector(s) that has been overlooked here. The OP is diversified across the US markets, but diversification could be extended even further. The inevitable overlap of 33 funds should also be corrected.

All this tax talk and nobody is touting ETFs? Of course, sales in a taxable account will still be subject to cap gains/losses. ETFs track a sector and/or an index so 6-8 funds could thoroughly diversify the OP. AVERAGE expenses are .09% as compared to 1.4% for mutual funds. There are brokerage transaction fees but they can be minimized in todays competitve online trading world. They trade midday (no missing out on an intraday price climb). They are usually more tax efficient than MFs as they don't spin-off capital gains. And although it probably doesn't apply here, they can be margined and/or optioned.

Reply to
kastnna

You can buy these funds through the web, through Index Funds Advisors

formatting link
You have to invest a minimum of 100K, and theycharge you a 1 percent fee though. I created my own small/micro cap value diversified portfolio of 28 stocks of undervalued companies with relatively strong earnings record. Buying these stocks cost $224 (through Fidelity), and re- balancing periodically the portfolio may add about 100 bucks a year. The portfolio composition is available at
formatting link
(files section).

Reply to
Jose Bailen

This may be the source of our difference of opinion, but...

I think the consensus of this group is that your asset allocation should be considered across all your assets, regardless of account type (some have extended that to include your home and even your job [human capital]). Of course, I am NOT suggesting that short term funds should be kept in a tax advantaged account. My point was that if the OP needs $10,000 to satisfy his allocation and already has $50,000 set aside in a savings account, why keep $10,000 in cash in a retirement account? It seems that if you look at his portfolio as a whole (i.e. including the $50,000 in savings), then his savings will serve as a volatility damper without adding another $10,000 lead weight to his return. When he consumes the $50,000, he could shift assets into cash in his retirement accounts. All this of course assumes that he a) has an allocation that demands a "cash" position, and b) has appropriate instruments available for that short-term cash. In other words, if he needs CD-like return for his allocation, then a CD or other vehicle of short enough duration to meet his short-term needs is available.

-Will

Reply to
Will Trice

I believe that ifa.com is the website of a financial advisor, so what you're saying doesn't contradict what I said.

Reply to
Andrew Koenig

Thanks, I'm going to review all the allocation tools. I'm wondering if I should just pay someone to sort it all out as im getting a little overwhelmed ;)

What are the downsides to the overlap?

Reply to
dan

Do you know why you own each of those 33 funds? Many of them have similar holdings. (How many of those funds have a top 10 position in Microsoft, for example?). If you ask the right questions and are willing to read about 6 hours of material, I think you could come up with allocation yourself (and help from others).

The second step of implementing can be done over time. Do you have a net "gain" or "loss" in the taxable account? IRAs and 401ks do not matter. But a large gain in the taxable account might cause some recomendations to be altered (as any sale would get taxed).

questions to ask- how long do you have until retirement? how much money have you saved for retirement? how much money will you need at retirement? quick calculation- take your current salary and divide by .04. That is a crude estimate at best, but a place to start. how much stocks and bonds do you feel comfortable holding? Answers might be 100-0, 80-20, 60-40 or something else (the numbers are percentages of stocks-bonds). if you saw your account balance decrease by 10% in a quarter, what would you do? if you saw your account balance decrease by 25% in a quarter, what would you do? find a web site you like (such as

formatting link
"Investment guides and tools link) and use "retirement planning"link. Go through the calculators or ask questions as appropriate.

Reply to
jIM

Overlap obfuscates the true allocations. Let's say the particular funds were all just .1% expense. Would having a Fidelity and a Vanguard large cap fund be so terrible? Maybe not, but what does it gain you? Where I really wondered was on the 4 in 1 fund, and a couple others, all from Fidelity, where the overlap was enough so that you couldn't just look at funds at say "I have X% in this category". If the ideal timing for reallocation is annually, your current number of funds would take twice to three times the effort to reallocate as compared to the 12 or so funds that can have you well diversified.

As others have stated, you may want to shift over time so the higher dividend funds are in post tax accounts, along with foreign. As Elle shared today, the foreign tax issue winds up costing you if in a tax sheltered account. Same with dividends which are favored in post tax accounts, but ordinary income when coming out of the pre-tax accounts. JOE

Reply to
joetaxpayer

snip

The above is in the vein of my thoughts: Tracking so many funds takes so much effort, and I bet with no perceptible advantage, that it will pay to consolidate.

Remember my caveat that evidently the dividends of foreign funds or stocks held in a taxable account may not have the favorable treatment that domestic stocks and funds do. I am not selling the one stock (Honda, or HMC) that I have because someone (Japan) is taking 7% of every dividend it pays, but I am mulling it all over. 'Sides, the stock has appreciated greatly in the eight months I have held it. This, with Ford and General Motors looking more tortured everyday, always disuades one from selling /too/ quickly.

Reply to
Elle

I'd half to check the index definition, but from memory (I am anchored a bit here by the UK, where 60% of the index is 20 stocks) the total market index is about 70% of so SP500, 20% or so mid cap, 10% small cap.

Reply to
darkness39

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.