Converting vs. Conversion for a Roth

Dec 24, 2009 4 Replies

Each of the past few years, my sister has put $6000 into an IRA. I do this acting as Power of Attorney for my sister.



After she figures out her taxes, she then recharacterize the appropriate amount to a Roth. She just hates filling out the 8606 form.



In 2010, I was thinking that instead of undergoing the contribution to the IRA, followed by a recharacterization, which should be rather small in 2010, as her income grows, it might be better to use that $6000 to pay tax on a conversion.



I believe that her marginal tax rate is 28%, so the $6000 would cover taxes on a conversion of $21428.57.


Sound right?


I think what I am really after is the following:

r1 = effective marginal rate on Federal taxes r2 = effective marginal rate on State taxes T= Target tax bite due to Roth conversion C= = Amount that can be converted to Roth for T tax bite

C=T/(r1+r2)

ASSuME that Roth conversion does not change tax bracket, does this sound right?

It is if what you're looking for is the answer to "I have $X available to pay taxes on a conversion. How much can I convert?"

Yes, assuming you don't itemize deductions. That would slightly lessen the Federal tax bite because of the deduction for state income tax. Unless you're in AMT land, in which case you don't deduct state taxes.

It's called simplification. Ask any member of Congress.

Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD

Getting a precise estimate is indeed affected by the cross-effects of deducting state taxes, but that overly complicates the formula, which is just a good first guess.

Another issue is how much T grows in a money market, or, say, balanced mutual fund, before the tax has to actually be paid, not to mention taxes on gains in the balanced fund.

Silly me, I did modify the formula to take into effect of state tax on federal tax.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required