End of year constructive receipt question

The lump sum is supposed to be the present value of the income stream - or perhaps the amount it would cost to purchase an annuity. So the numbers are roughly equivalent in terms of real value.

The estate tax would be on the present value of the future income stream.

Under IRS regulations, as I recall, nothing happens until the identity of the winner is made known (by his claiming his winnings, I assume). But at that point income recognition is retroactive to the date of the drawing. Stu

Reply to
Stuart A. Bronstein
Loading thread data ...
Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

(balance snipped and not responded to here)

Dick said the "general rule" is to take the money and run. Most people do. However the correct answer is "it depends." Yep.

I would do a present value analysis of lump sum versus pay outs over the time horizon in order to compare the two sums. Then I would modify it for the recipient's life expectancy, and figure in any estate tax consequences. And I'd charge my client about.... oh.... guess i'd have to figure that out, too! (grin) Holiday ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

Moderator: How could I forget to include "It depends"?

Reply to
Harlan Lunsford

If your investment rate assumption is interest (or short term capital gains) at the now-prevailing rate (the same one as the lottery buys from a bank), then you're better off taking the annuity. If you can do better than that rate, especially if it's in long term capital gains, you're better off with a lump sum.

No; that was discussed much earlier. It's income in respect of the decedent, and subject to two levels of taxation immediately. Seth

Reply to
Seth Breidbart

I'm not a lawyer.

Nobody knows whether or not the (hypothetical) lottery ticket in my pocket was intended, when I purchased it, as a shared asset in that I gifted 25% of it to each of my (hypothetical) children. Since its value at the time of purchase was $1, nobody cared, either. Now that I've won $umpteen million, it's time to see a lawyer to formalize the arrangement properly. Seth

Reply to
Seth Breidbart

New York (used to?) say that. Minnesota doesn't. I think the IRS lets you decide late, but some states might not.

See my previous message; it was split among his family before the winning, but when the ticket was worth $1 nobody cared. Seth

Reply to
Seth Breidbart

I'm sure the lawyer would have no problem with the concept of your splitting your winnings among his family.

--ron

Reply to
Ron Rosenfeld

You forgot to go to law school - that's the only thing they teach there. Stu

Moderator: I taught my students "It depends" to the point that one student tried to use it as the answer to an essay question.

Reply to
Stuart A. Bronstein
Reply to
Stuart A. Bronstein
Reply to
William Brenner

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.