Individual 401(k) in LLC - how to book and report on 1065?

An LLC is held jointly by a married couple. One of the spouses is a active partner and LLC member-manager; the other is a LLC member and passive. The passive partner receives guaranteed payments. The active partner has no guaranteed payments.

(1) How to properly book individual 401(k) contributions made by the company on behalf of its members? I saw conflicting views: as general expense, or as guaranteed payment.

If it is a guaranteed payment it will result in additional SE tax for passive partner. Since the amount of 401(k) contributions depends on income from self-employment it would create a recursive relationship.

(2) The 401(k) contributions made by the company in 2008 but applied to 2007 (typical case if you contribute between Jan 1 and Apr 15) are company's expense for 2008 but can they be claimed as such? My understanding is that they can't, because they were already deducted on partners 2007 individual income tax returns. Putting them on 2008 schedule K-1 line 13, code R also does not appear right because the amounts reflect prior year contributions. How do I report them correctly?

(3) Finally, the company made a contribution to one of the partners 401 (k) during 2008 toward FY2008. I am pretty sure that this amount should go on that partner's 2008 K-1 code R. Is that correct?

Thanks in advance!

Reply to
volx
Loading thread data ...

If you can figure out how to defer compensation into a qualified plan without having paid SE tax on the entire compensation, I'm interested in how that can be made to happen.

Steve

Reply to
Steve Pope

I'm with Steve on this one!

How or why on Earth would a passive member get guaranteed payments while the managing member gets none?

Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA

Reply to
Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, AB

Managing partner pays SE income on its entire share of partnership profits whether he draws on capital or not. Do you know answer to my questions re 401(k)?

Reply to
volx

SNIPPED

Maybe - but I'm not sure because I don't have all of your information. And you still have not answered my question - why does the passive partner get guaranteed payments? Paying guaranteed payments may well mean that this person is NOT passive at all.

With that caveat, payments into a company sponsored plan are on behalf of the partner or member and could very well be considered additional distributions to the member, to be taken on their personal return;

Or they could be a company only paid contribution to the plan, with no impact on the member;

Or they could be treated as guaranteed payments subject to additional SE tax.

It depends on the intricacies of how the plan was set up and what all was being done and how it was being done.

Quite frankly if you're doing this return you are in over your head. Do NOT expect to get a definitive answer here. Those of us who are pros who respond here do so as a courtesy with the caveat that the information you get from any of us is worth exactly what you paid for it - NOTHING.

If you are a nontax professional I would suggest you get help from a tax pro right away. If you are a tax pro I would say that you still need help from a professional experienced with such matters, you are foolish to rely solely on what you get here from anyone - ME INCLUDED (and there is no better tax pro than me! ). Also, if you're a pro you need to be very careful here, doing work for which you do not have the requisite experience will endanger your ticket faster than just about anything else you can do.

Get professional help on this, Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA

Reply to
Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, AB

This may be less unusual than you believe. Typically if a limited partner is performing some non-core service (tax accounting, investment advice) for the partnership they might be paid a guaranteed payment. Obviously, it would be abusive to disguise partnership income as a guaranteed payment so as to defer it into a qualified plan, but there are many many scenarios where the guaranteed payments are legit.

I agree. I would not want to be responsible for a plan with multiple unrelated participants without having a retirement plan professional look over my work.

Beyond that, I have no additional thoughts other than to read Pub 560, and the instructions for form 1065, which seem to answer most or all of the questions posed here. Furthermore, the following message board is potentially relevant:

formatting link
One additional thought I have, not applicable to the immediate situation, is that an alternative to setting up a plan at the partnership level would be for the individual partners to each set up a solo 401(k) plan. That would seem to avoid all of the sticky reporting issues, and you could possibly end up deferring more income (up to $49,000 in 2009).

Finally there is a theoretical question: does wrapping an LLC around the partnership change anything? Probably some opinions on this can be found at the benefitslink.com board.

Hope this helps.

Steve

Reply to
Steve Pope

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.