Tax rebate - what will it cost me in 2009?

I've read conflicting stories on the rebates, one said I will have to pay the entire rebate of $600 back in reduced tax refund or an actual increase in my taxes by the whole amount, on my 09 return (MSN money article) - another said I will only have to pay TAX on the $600 as it would increase my income by that amount. What's the correct answer? Thanks!

Reply to
frenchy
Loading thread data ...

"frenchy" wrote

Federal tax refunds are not taxable income on federal returns. Although Congress could change it for this rebate.

Other than that, remember that this gimmick ~has~ to be paid for by someone at some time. They aren't overflowing with money in DC, so this'll just add to the deficit (ie: money collected being less than money spent). If not paid for directly on the 2008 tax returns in some manner, expect increasing taxes (increase in tax rates, decrease in deductions/exemptions, or both) in the future years.

Ya can't have it all and have others pay for it all.

So that old commercial saying "You can pay me now, or you can pay me later" applies here - you're going to pay later for what you get today.

Reply to
Paul Thomas, CPA

It's a refundable credit toward 2008 taxes. In effect it reduces your 2008 tax liability by the rebate amount, and if the rebate winds up being more than your 2008 tax, you get to keep the change.

You ignore the rebate through the year. Don't adjust your withholding or estimated tax payments, and you'll wind up with about the same refund/balance due when you file your 2008 return as you would have without the rebate. Of course, you will have had the rebate check previously.

If you wind up not getting a rebate check you'll get the credit when you file your 2008 return.

Reply to
Phil Marti

formatting link
Milt Baker CPA Michigan

Reply to
cpabakem01

The bill has finally passed both branches of congress, and signed by the president.

See

formatting link
Text of LegislationClick [H.R.5140.ENR] Seems the rebate amount will be determined by the 2008 taxable year, but they will use the 2007 tax return to determine how much of a rebate check to send to you this year in May -- well, this is my reading of section g1, but the language is too cryptic for me to understand fully. So if your 2007 income is too high you might get nothing in May, but if your 2008 income is low you could get a credit on the 2008 return which you file in 2009. Is that right? If your

2007 income is low enough you might get something, but if your 2008 income is too high then what? The URL referenced above says you get to keep the rebate.
Reply to
removeps-groups

You understand, although I'd use different words. The "rebate" is a refundable credit on your 2008 taxes. "Refundable" means you get it even if it reduces your tax below zero.

The checks to be sent out in 2008 are an estimation, based on your 2007 return, of what your 2008 credit will be.

Change "might" to "will," and you got it.

That is correct. When you file your 2008 return in 2009 the credit applies to your return. It is reduced by the amount of the advance check you got, BUT NOT BELOW ZERO. That means you keep the change.

Reply to
Phil Marti

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.