Unconstitutional FTB 2005 amnesty stipulation?

Summary from

formatting link
your client is going through an FTB audit, you must lookat defense tactics right now. Under amnesty, a taxpayer witha pre- 2003 tax liability that is still unresolved on March31, 2005, will be assessed a penalty of 50% of the intereston the assessment. There are a few choices. · Proceed with the audit. If you win - great, no penalties. If not, any liability will be subject to the extra 50% penalty. · Agree to the assessment now, pay it, and file a claim for refund, bringing the case back to audit. You avoid the 50% interest penalty. · Request amnesty during the amnesty period (February 1,

2005 through March 31, 2005), pay the tax, and avoid penalties. However, by going through amnesty you lose the right to a refund of the tax paid that last requirement looks unconstitutional to me. Even a business/private contract would be limited in how many (civil?) rights could be signed away. · File for partial amnesty by agreeing to the issues in which your position is weak and avoid the 50% interest penalty with respect to the tax on those issues. Proceed with the audit with respect to the remaining issues.
> > >
Reply to
nospam
Loading thread data ...

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.