Building a buy to let portfolio

Hi everyone

A simple question: how can I develop my single buy-to-let property (with approx 40k of equity) into a portfolio of BTL properties?

Is there a common formula that investors follow? I'm not in it to make a quick profit - it's more about planning my kids future and maybe retiring a few years early (hence I don't want to expose myself to a high level of risk).

I'd be grateful for any suggestions

Simon R

Reply to
Simon R
Loading thread data ...

Simon,

There is a difference between how the model works and if the timing is good to implement the model.

First, I do not believe in market timing when it comes to property. Better is to focus on the cash flow and buying a bargain. In up or down markets there are bargains and there can be property that will safely cash flow even if there is no appreciation.

Back to the question.

You would refinance the property to pull out equity to purchase the next property. Or you could choose to use other capital to make the purchase. Or you could look to obtain 100% financing (ignore the mechanics for a minute). If you find that the new property will not cash flow but you run a significant surplus on the prior property then the portfolio may cash flow.

Figure you need between 1.25 and 1.50 for a debt service multiple. The income projected needs to be 1.25 times the monthly mortgage payment at a minimum is how you apply the ratio. If you really want to speculate that prices will rise long term yet the cash flow is not there to cover everything and a buffer then 'buy' a larger buffer. This means taking a lump sum of cash and setting it aside to fund the gaps. The gaps are real and they do happen. Note that 'buying' the buffer is really a conservative way to speculate on appreciation rather than have the tenant pay for your speculation.

I have been investing for over 20 years in the property sector. Multiple countries no less. Rather than focus on the doom and gloom a long term investor looks at the fundamentals (mostly the cash flow). If there is cash flow then there is someone else paying to keep you in the game. If they really are paying enough to cover all costs and all reserves you just sit back and let the market come to you if and when it does. If the market was never to appreciate (no doom and gloomer will argue this point) you likely will still see rents rise. The logic is people who have jobs expect that over 10 or 20 years their pay will rise. Rents tend to move at the same time broadly speaking. People figure that paying up to 1/3 of their income for housing is reasonable (3.5 times 1 person's income). Hence long term rises in employment and income levels translate into long term rent and housing price rises.

BTW - If you buy in an area that has a lack or jobs and no future prospects the logic still applies. I am saying there is a connection between income levels and rising employment that over long periods is even more important than short term interest rates.

John Corey

Reply to
John

"i don't want to expose myself to a high level of risk"

Indebtedness at record levels, unemployment rising for 12 months straight, recession on the high street, economy slowing down, interest rates likely to start rising again, house prices likely to fall over the next 5 years.

Investing in property at the moment is high risk, no matter your view on the subject. A lower risk approach woulf be to MEW all your equity and place it all on red or black.

Reply to
jameshamilton777

Be ready to subsidize the mortgage shortfall each money as BTL yields are now often below the mortgage rate (excluding, insurance, voids, fees, etc).

I doubt there are many places left in the UK with >7% yields

Reply to
Virgil's Ghost

That's true, but you also have to look at the "opportunity cost". On a cash flow basis you could ride out a 15% tumble in the housing market, alternatively you could realise your gains and sell your portfolio at the peak of the market (yeah, when?) and drop them into some other asset class, say the stock market, that might gain an additional 15%. Your 30% aggravate return could then be leveraged up for a return to the property market at more reasonable values.

Obviously the above has to be viable enough to offset the incurred costs, time, fees or sentiment. There may also be an 'opportunity cost' for not being in the property market.

As you say, all models are effective depending upon timing, in hindsight people should have dropped their property investments 18 months ago and invested in gold or commodities as they've shown a much better return. Some 'investors' are MEW'ing their BTL portfolios in order to invest in the stock market believing they're getting the best of both worlds... or quite possibly the worst if they're timing is wrong!

Reply to
Virgil's Ghost

That says a lot!

Reply to
Virgil's Ghost

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.