I'd have thought it was quite different to Dixons etc. Banks and insco's are regulated by the FSA who have a lot of clout. I'm pretty sure Dixons aren't answerable to the FSA.
I'd have thought it was quite different to Dixons etc. Banks and insco's are regulated by the FSA who have a lot of clout. I'm pretty sure Dixons aren't answerable to the FSA.
Bitstring , from the wonderful person Roger Mills said
Actually they can't say that either - extrapolating from 20 years ago the chance would be about zero. At the rate the government is throwing data away, it could reach 100% PA in a few years time .... I just hope the 200 Indians with GSV as an identity can breathe vacuum .. 8>.
utter bollocks. The onus would be upon them to prove that you *did* take out any loan
"(not quite so) Fat Sam" wrote
Even when selling insurance-related products, such as extended warranties?
Dunno - but they *are* answerable to Trading Standards for compliance with SoGA, and have been hauled over the coals a number of times for trying to deny common law rights to people who hadn't fallen for their exorbitant extended warranties.
Well, one in four people over a lifetime. They would only make a loss if these one in four people claimed more than once ever 28 years.
I still think the bank's claims are exaggerated though.
They are.
Can you insure against the Identity Register & ID Cards? ;-)
M.
Yes - elect a different government!
BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.