Lloyds bank - thank you for the laugh!

Last year I took out a cash ISA with Lloyds bank and the rules were very clear that I cannot touch the money for a year without terrible pain in the form of the loss of 90 days interest.

However, out of the goodness of their hearts they have written to me and said that if I want to transfer the money elsewhere now they will waive this penalty - Lord bless 'em!

Of course considering the current situation a cynical person might question their motives, as this product is due to pay 6.5% interest (tax free) in April 2009.

;-)

Cheers!

Reply to
Confused of Bristol
Loading thread data ...

similarly, I have a company deposit account with Alliance and Leicester now owned by Santander. Santander have recently bought Abbey. So I now get a letter from Abbey, who have access to my address through Santandar, saying they can do more with my money............yes right.

Reply to
Ten Pin Bowling

When it was clear what was going to happen, I quickly took out cash ISA bonds for me and wife to the max. at 5.5%. The week after they started the big slide. If I, a financial numpty, could see what was going to happen, why couldn't the banks with their high flying mega bonus experts?

BobC

Reply to
BobC

Cheeky so and sos.

Reply to
mogga

In message , Confused of Bristol writes

Heh Heh! I have a similar account with Nationwide also maturing in April, and I haven't received an offer yet. I wish I'd trebled the amount though... As for the latest drop in the bank rate....

Reply to
Gordon H

I got the same letter! Made me even more determined to transfer out when it matures. Is there a sensible & ethical financial institution out there? Taleb, the black swan guy, doesn't think so. He is saying all the banks should be nationalised and the bankers thrown out of their jobs. Sounds about right. On that score, I guess we should be plumping for National Savings. But, in a sense, that is backing the government, and their record is little better than the banker's--after all, they are supposed to regulate them! Then again, at least we can vote the politicians out and any money invested in National Savings that finds its way into big bonuses for bankers will get people asking a lot of questions! So on a best of a bad lot argument, I think National Savings looks best. Of course the interest rates are unlikely to be the best, but safety is maximised, and I think it's worth losing

1% just to hit the bankers where it hurts...
Reply to
Paul Grieg

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.