More evidence against currency pegs

The Daily Telegraph

Hedge funds target currency pegs By Ambrose Evans- Pritchard Last Updated: 7:44am BST 15/10/2007

The wolf packs are circling. Fifteen years after George Soros smashed the sterling and lira pegs of Europe's Exchange Rate Mechanism, central banks have invited hedge funds to pounce again. This time on a global scale.

Sitting ducks are on offer across Eastern Europe, the Middle East and emerging Asia, each offering an irresistible one-way bet for speculators with deep pockets.

What the candidates all have in common is inflation, the ever-higher penalty they pay for chaining their destinies through currency pegs and dirty floats to the dollar and the euro, the currencies of two enfeebled blocs - one a fat roué at the end of his credit, the other a stooped old gentleman with a stick.

The global M3 money supply is growing at 10.6pc as stimulus from America, Europe - and Japan, through the carry trade - leaks out to the vibrant parts of the world economy.

Money is expanding at 18pc in Saudi Arabia, 19pc in China, 24pc in India, 36pc in the United Arab Emirates, 41pc in Russia and 69pc in Venezuela.

With the usual lag, inflation has at last hit. Prices are rising at

6.5pc in China, 9pc in Russia, 9pc in Vietnam, 11pc in the UAE and 12pc in Qatar - to name a few.

Only nations with very rigorous monetary regimes seem able to resist this tide of liquidity. Most are floundering. Hence the rush by investors to profit from these unrestrained bubbles by piling into their stock markets.

The MSCI emerging markets index has risen by 30pc since the credit crunch hit in August and triggered a reflationary rescue by the Fed and the European Central Bank.

The easy way to play the game is through multinationals that generate a big chunk of their profits in the boom zones. Citigroup has advised rotating from "mid-cap" to "Uber-cap" stocks, which on average generate 23pc of sales in emerging markets. They cite AXA, BAT, Lafarge, Henkel, Nokia, Philips and Siemens, among others.

This scramble for exposure to global equity inflation explains the force of the rallies on Wall Street and Europe's bourses since August. The Dow has vaulted to new records: the small-cap Russell 2000 has not. Bears read that as an ominous "non-confirmation".

At some point, East Europe, the Gulf and Asia must jam on the brakes, or kiss goodbye to economic stability. Fifteen or 20 countries are already on the cusp of an inflationary spiral. If they don't act, hedge funds will do the work for them.

The easiest prey are in the Baltics and Balkans, where EU newcomers have let rip by importing an ECB monetary policy designed for the slow barges on the Rhine. All are overheating.

Inflation is now 11pc in Latvia, and 7pc in Estonia and Lithuania. Property prices in the capitals of all three are more expensive than Berlin. Inflation is 12pc in Bulgaria and 6pc in Romania.

The ECB has now invited the wolves to kill.

Board member Lorenzo Bini Smaghi said East Europe's pegs had pushed interest rates too low for the needs of fast-growing catch-up economies. "This might lead to boom-and-bust cycles, with potentially very severe adjustments costs that may delay real convergence."

Was this his way of saying the ECB will not defend the region's ERM exchange bands? He is an old hand. He must know that the ERM crisis in

1992 was triggered by Bundesbank hints that "one or two currencies" should be devalued. In 1992 the target currencies were too weak. Now they are too strong. Speculators are happy either way.

For the petrodollar sheikdoms and Asia's tigers, the curse is the dollar, not the euro.

The inflation pressures were bad enough before the Fed slashed rates a half point to 4.75pc.

These countries are now having to import a loose money policy designed to stave off a US recession. It is pouring gasoline on the flames.

Kuwait became the first Gulf state to ditch its dollar peg. Others are hanging on, but inflation has reached 10pc in the United Arab Emirates and 11.8pc in the gas-rich neighbour of Qatar.

They have balked at cutting interest rates in lockstep with the Fed. So have the Saudis. This makes pegs untenable over time. Matt Vogel, of Barclays Capital, says a riyal "carry trade" has already begun in Saudi Arabia. Speculative flows are surging into the kingdom.

The Gulf region has $3,500bn under management in reserves and wealth funds. It has the firepower to shoot wolves, but does it make any sense to do so? Buying dollars leads to even more inflation. In any case, Qatar has already slashed the dollar share of its $50bn investment fund from 99pc to 40pc. The game is up.

Further east, Vietnam is throwing in the towel as inflation hits 9pc. It said it will no longer hold down the dong by massive purchases of US bonds. Singapore, Taiwan, and Korea have begun to change tack, slowing dollar accumulation before inflation gets out of control. "There is evidence that foreign-exchange intervention strategies are changing across the region," said Goldman Sachs.

China too is a target. Its crawling dollar peg is held too low, driving inflation to levels last seen just before the Tiananmen protests.

Reserves of $1,430bn are no help. They are the problem. As Nomura's chairman, Junichi Ujiie, told me in Tokyo: "We're all trying to get money into China any way we can because we know the renminbi has to rise. It's a one way bet. It's wonderful."

We face a new kind of currency crisis. Post-war bust-ups have usually been on the fringes.

This time the capitalist core is rotten. Neither Western Europe nor the United States are strong enough to support the twin pillars of the world's currency system. Nobody else is ready.

formatting link
15.xml

Reply to
Daytona
Loading thread data ...

This time the capitalist core is rotten. Neither Western Europe nor the United States are strong enough to support the twin pillars of the world's currency system. Nobody else is ready.

formatting link
Well I don't know what to make of it all, on one hand we've got people telling us that our standard of living can keep on growing almost indefinitely i.e. 'airports have to keep expanding in size because in 20 years' time they will be carrying millions of extra passengers'. Yet on the other hand there are others telling us that it's all totally unsustainable and it's going to grind to a shuddering standstill sooner than many people realise, whilst I see that oil prices are now at an all time high, and other than brought about by a major recession I can't really see prices dropping to their previous levels.

Reply to
Ivan

The Euro seems to be managing perfectly well thanks.

Oil today was at 86 US dollars a barrel. The Euro is currently around

1.42 to the US dollar (used to buy oil). A couple of years ago it was as low as 82 Euro cents. The barrel was around 60 dollars at the time I believe which, in effect, makes oil (for Euro countries) cheaper now than then.
Reply to
John of Aix

So, two years ago you only had to pay 0.82 Euro for your dollar's worth of oil. Now you need to spend 1.42 Euro for your dollar's worth. Even if the price of oil had remained the same, this represents a 72% increase in price. Taking into account the price increase, this represents a 132% overall increase.

Reply to
True Blue

Erm no dear, that isn't the way it works. A dollar used to *cost* 1 euro and 28 cents, now one Euro *buys* one dollar and 42 cents. Did you do any maths at school?

Reply to
John of Aix

messagenews:47149ffe$0$5094$ snipped-for-privacy@news.orange.fr...

I think John got it wrong!

He said that the there is currently 1.42 Euro to the $US when I think he meant there are 1.42 $US to the Euro making 1$ worth ~70 Euro cents. This represents a devaluation of the $US of ~14.6% against the Euro.

This article is substantially about "bucking the market" in Thatcher terms.

The US, UK and Europe floated their currencies years ago. These days, a currency against any other is worth what the market is prepared to pay on the day.

Countries with huge favourable trade balances and/or huge investments tied up in a particular currency are reluctant to allow these advantages to drift away and so are attempting to peg their currencies. This means they sell off their exports at an effective discount whilst paying what amounts to an equivalent premium (or tariff!) on imports. This maintains the volumes of their exports, discourages offsetting imports and maintains the value of overseas investments.

The problem is that history teaches us (with bitter memories) that this does not work. The ECB, the Fed nor any other CB is not going to support these undervalued currencies if and when (probably when) the crunch comes. This the Sorros' of this world are being presented with a one way bet. They are faced with at least three currencies that must in the final analysis must revalue. Buying these currencies will accelerate to a point where the dam bursts and the currency under attack is revalued.

Under that sceanrio, Chinese goods for example would become more expensive but Chinese dollar investments would be worth less in xuan terms.

Reply to
Mel Rowing

Being a bit of an insomniac I often listen to the radio in the middle of the night, last week on radio five they reckoned that if everyone in the world demanded the same standard of living as we enjoy here in the UK then it would require the resources of three earth sized planets just to sustain it all.

I don't believe for one minute that the third world is going to stop multiplying at a rate which is predicted to increase the world's population by another 50 per cent within the next 40 years.

Last night there was an item on India and how their economy is forging ahead, and it's big business with their vested interest in globalization who are actually encouraging the less developed nations to try and emulate our standard of living, it's patently obvious that ultimately this can only mean bad news for those of us in the existing developed nations of the world.

Already dozens of our medieval churches are being striped of their lead roofs, manhole covers, road signs and even cable from electricity sub stations are being stolen for scrap to feed the insatiable appetite for raw materials of countries like China.

What I'm asking is where is it all going to end in the next few decades?. not as I'm going to be around to see it anyway, but like most responsible parents I do worry for my children and grandchildren.

Reply to
Ivan

Well there are a number of alterntives.

One is to exclude the third world altogether from the process of economic progress. The result of that would surely be endless wars and increasing migrations which thus far western governments have shown little ability or inclination to control.

Next is to develop third world economies at the expense of western economies exchanging western wealth for third world consumer goods and increasingly services until there is parity. I can't see that going down too well politically.

Alternatively, we can carry on as we are doing in the hope that markets, as they have done in the past, adjust to conditions and relying increasingly upon technology to ensure better use of scarce resources. The hope being of course that one day populations will stabilise and materialism will go into decline and other social appetites such a aestheticism and spiritualism will move into the ascendancy.

There is but one certainty.

We cannot take more than is there.

Reply to
Mel Rowing

Very true Mel, but when there's not enough room for hungry pigs to get their snouts into the trough, it usually winds up in one hell of a fight!

Reply to
Ivan

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.